Predictive value of a positive pocket swab for the occurrence of device infection in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients undergoing generator replacement or lead revision

Abstract Introduction Bacterial colonization of generator pockets in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients plays a key role in the development of device infection after revision surgery. Pocket swabs taken at revision may be useful for predicting device infection, but their prognostic value is not precisely known. Aim of the study was to evaluate the predictive value of positive pocket swabs for cardiac device infection in ICD patients undergoing revision surgery. Methods A total of 646 consecutive ICD patients from a prospective single-centre ICD-registry who underwent elective device replacement, system upgrade or lead revision between 2014 and 6/2023 were analyzed. Independent predictors for device infection were evaluated by a Cox regression analysis adjusting for age, gender, EF, insulin dependent diabetes, anticoagulation, multiple leads, revision surgery and the PADIT score. Results Positive pocket swabs were obtained in 12% of patients. The baseline characteristics of ICD patients with positive versus negative pocket swabs were similar (Table 1). With an average follow-up of 3 years, the infection rate in patients with positive pocket swabs was around 5 times higher than in patients with negative swabs (19% versus 4%, p < 0.001). In a Cox regression analysis, a positive pocket swab was the strongest independent predictor for device infection during follow-up (hazard ratio 4.26, 95% confidence interval 2.15 – 8.45, Table 2). Conclusion A positive swab from ICD-pockets in patients undergoing generator replacement or lead revision is an independent predictor of device infection during follow-up. These results support the routine collection of pocket swabs from patients undergoing revision surgery.Table 1Table 2

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.736
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive value of a positive pocket swab for the occurrence of device infection in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients undergoing generator replacement or lead revision

A Wenz, Mariana Strauss, U Weisse, Christiane Werling et al.
European Heart Journal
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
article

Predictive value of a positive pocket swab for the occurrence of device infection in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients undergoing generator replacement or lead revision

A Wenz, Mariana Strauss, U Weisse, Christiane Werling, Ralf Zahn, Thomas Kleemann, K Kouraki, O Mohammad, S B Mousavi, Falk‐Udo Sack
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Bacterial colonization of generator pockets in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients plays a key role in the development of device infection after revision surgery. Pocket swabs taken at revision may be useful for predicting device infection, but their prognostic value is not precisely known. Aim of the study was to evaluate the predictive value of positive pocket swabs for cardiac device infection in ICD patients undergoing revision surgery. Methods A total of 646 consecutive ICD patients from a prospective single-centre ICD-registry who underwent elective device replacement, system upgrade or lead revision between 2014 and 6/2023 were analyzed. Independent predictors for device infection were evaluated by a Cox regression analysis adjusting for age, gender, EF, insulin dependent diabetes, anticoagulation, multiple leads, revision surgery and the PADIT score. Results Positive pocket swabs were obtained in 12% of patients. The baseline characteristics of ICD patients with positive versus negative pocket swabs were similar (Table 1). With an average follow-up of 3 years, the infection rate in patients with positive pocket swabs was around 5 times higher than in patients with negative swabs (19% versus 4%, p < 0.001). In a Cox regression analysis, a positive pocket swab was the strongest independent predictor for device infection during follow-up (hazard ratio 4.26, 95% confidence interval 2.15 – 8.45, Table 2). Conclusion A positive swab from ICD-pockets in patients undergoing generator replacement or lead revision is an independent predictor of device infection during follow-up. These results support the routine collection of pocket swabs from patients undergoing revision surgery.Table 1Table 2

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Klinikum Ludwigshafen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.