Long-term follow-up after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia in patients with pulmonary hypertension

Abstract Introduction Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia (AF / AT) is established treatment in selected population. Only limited data, including long-term results, exist in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Recently published prospective multicentric trial showed that more extensive radiofrequency catheter ablation of the bi-atrial arrhythmogenic substrate instead of clinical arrhythmia ablation alone is not beneficial in terms of arrhythmia recurrence in patients with AF / AT and PH. Now, we present the results of an extended, long-term follow-up from one of the study centres. Methods Patients with combined post- and pre-capillary or isolated pre-capillary PH and AF / AT indicated to catheter ablation were enrolled and randomised 1:1 into two parallel treatment arms. Patients underwent either clinical arrhythmia ablation only (Limited ablation group) or clinical arrhythmia plus substrate-based ablation (Extended ablation group). The primary endpoint was arrhythmia recurrence >30 s without antiarrhythmic drugs after the 3-month blanking period. Results A total of 52 patients (median age 71 years (IQR 62-75); 27 males) were enrolled. The presumable clinical arrhythmia was AF in 20 and AT in 32 patients, including typical AFL in 22 patients. Limited and extended ablation group included 28 and 24 patients, respectively. During the extended follow-up period of median 31 (IQR: 18; 46) months, the primary endpoint occurred in 17 patients (71 %) vs. 13 patients (46 %) in the Extended vs. Limited ablation group (p = 0.096). In parallel, overall mortality was comparable between groups (9 [38 %] vs. 11 [39 %]). Only 2 patients had recurrence of AFL during the extended follow-up. However, new different arrhythmia was documented in another 7 patients after the AFL ablation. Conclusion In PH patients, recurrence of AF / AT after a catheter ablation is frequent and the recurrence rate increases with the duration of follow-up. Ablation strategy seems to have no impact on arrhythmia free survival. Patients with typical atrial flutter have significantly higher chance to maintain sinus rhythm after a catheter ablation compared to AF or other AT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.396
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term follow-up after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia in patients with pulmonary hypertension

Milan Dusík, Štěpán Havránek, Zdeňka Fingrová, Pavel Jansa et al.
European Heart Journal
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
article

Long-term follow-up after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia in patients with pulmonary hypertension

Milan Dusík, Štěpán Havránek, Zdeňka Fingrová, Pavel Jansa, David Ambrož, Vladimír Dytrych, Aleš Linhart, Dan Wichterle
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia (AF / AT) is established treatment in selected population. Only limited data, including long-term results, exist in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Recently published prospective multicentric trial showed that more extensive radiofrequency catheter ablation of the bi-atrial arrhythmogenic substrate instead of clinical arrhythmia ablation alone is not beneficial in terms of arrhythmia recurrence in patients with AF / AT and PH. Now, we present the results of an extended, long-term follow-up from one of the study centres. Methods Patients with combined post- and pre-capillary or isolated pre-capillary PH and AF / AT indicated to catheter ablation were enrolled and randomised 1:1 into two parallel treatment arms. Patients underwent either clinical arrhythmia ablation only (Limited ablation group) or clinical arrhythmia plus substrate-based ablation (Extended ablation group). The primary endpoint was arrhythmia recurrence >30 s without antiarrhythmic drugs after the 3-month blanking period. Results A total of 52 patients (median age 71 years (IQR 62-75); 27 males) were enrolled. The presumable clinical arrhythmia was AF in 20 and AT in 32 patients, including typical AFL in 22 patients. Limited and extended ablation group included 28 and 24 patients, respectively. During the extended follow-up period of median 31 (IQR: 18; 46) months, the primary endpoint occurred in 17 patients (71 %) vs. 13 patients (46 %) in the Extended vs. Limited ablation group (p = 0.096). In parallel, overall mortality was comparable between groups (9 [38 %] vs. 11 [39 %]). Only 2 patients had recurrence of AFL during the extended follow-up. However, new different arrhythmia was documented in another 7 patients after the AFL ablation. Conclusion In PH patients, recurrence of AF / AT after a catheter ablation is frequent and the recurrence rate increases with the duration of follow-up. Ablation strategy seems to have no impact on arrhythmia free survival. Patients with typical atrial flutter have significantly higher chance to maintain sinus rhythm after a catheter ablation compared to AF or other AT.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
General University Hospital in Prague (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.