Effect of catheter ablation vs medical therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with atrial fibrillation

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risks of stroke and mortality. AF ablation in patients with heart failure (HF) was associated with a lower risk of death and hospitalisation for worsening HF. Whether AF ablation is beneficial to improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with concomitant hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and AF remains unclear. Objective To investigate whether AF ablation is more effective than conventional medical therapy for improving outcomes in HCM. Methods 2,281 patients with HCM and AF undergoing catheter ablation or medical therapy (antiarrhythmic drugs or rate control drugs) in 2005–2015 were identified from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. The primary composite outcome of death from cardiovascular causes, ischaemic stroke, hospitalization for worsening HF, or acute myocardial infarction was compared between catheter ablation and medical therapy using propensity score overlap weighting. The time-at-risk was counted from the first medical therapy, and catheter ablation was analysed as a time-varying exposure. Results Of the included (41.1% female; median age: 66 years), 145 (6.1%) underwent catheter ablation for AF during the study period. During a mean follow-up of 3.1 (IQR 1.3–5.8) years, a total of 831 composite outcomes occurred including 292 cardiovascular deaths and 401 strokes. Catheter ablation, compared with medical therapy, was associated with lower risks of the primary composite outcome (weighted incidence rate: 3.84 vs. 6.43 per 100 person-years; weighted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38–0.96) and ischaemic stroke (weighted HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19–0.97). The association between ablation and a lower risk of composite outcome was more pronounced in cases of ablation success whereas no significant difference was observed in cases of ablation failure. Conclusions In patients with AF and HCM, catheter ablation was associated with a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes than medical therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.628
Primary Topic
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of catheter ablation vs medical therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with atrial fibrillation

H N Pak, Jae‐Sun Uhm, Daham Kim, Eunsun Jang et al.
European Heart Journal
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
article

Effect of catheter ablation vs medical therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with atrial fibrillation

H N Pak, Jae‐Sun Uhm, Daham Kim, Eunsun Jang, Hee Tae Yu, J H Sung, B Joung, Tae‐Hoon Kim, P S Yang, M H Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risks of stroke and mortality. AF ablation in patients with heart failure (HF) was associated with a lower risk of death and hospitalisation for worsening HF. Whether AF ablation is beneficial to improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with concomitant hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and AF remains unclear. Objective To investigate whether AF ablation is more effective than conventional medical therapy for improving outcomes in HCM. Methods 2,281 patients with HCM and AF undergoing catheter ablation or medical therapy (antiarrhythmic drugs or rate control drugs) in 2005–2015 were identified from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. The primary composite outcome of death from cardiovascular causes, ischaemic stroke, hospitalization for worsening HF, or acute myocardial infarction was compared between catheter ablation and medical therapy using propensity score overlap weighting. The time-at-risk was counted from the first medical therapy, and catheter ablation was analysed as a time-varying exposure. Results Of the included (41.1% female; median age: 66 years), 145 (6.1%) underwent catheter ablation for AF during the study period. During a mean follow-up of 3.1 (IQR 1.3–5.8) years, a total of 831 composite outcomes occurred including 292 cardiovascular deaths and 401 strokes. Catheter ablation, compared with medical therapy, was associated with lower risks of the primary composite outcome (weighted incidence rate: 3.84 vs. 6.43 per 100 person-years; weighted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38–0.96) and ischaemic stroke (weighted HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19–0.97). The association between ablation and a lower risk of composite outcome was more pronounced in cases of ablation success whereas no significant difference was observed in cases of ablation failure. Conclusions In patients with AF and HCM, catheter ablation was associated with a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes than medical therapy.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Yonsei University (KR), CHA University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.