Assessment of quality of life and ICD shock-related anxiety in Asian patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the PainFree SST study

Abstract Background The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) reduces mortality in patients at risk of sudden cardiac death. However, it is not known if the psychological status of ICD patients differs by geography. The aim of this analysis is to compare Quality of Life (QoL) and ICD shock-related anxiety between ICD patients in Asian with those in other countries. Methods The PainFree SST study was a prospective, multicenter, global study that enrolled 2770 patients including 225 from from Asia (181 from Japan, 25 from India, and 19 from Malaysia). The EuroQol 5-D (EQ-5D) measured QoL and the Florida Shock Anxiety Scale (FSAS) measured ICD shock-related anxiety. These questionnaires were administered bi-annually and monthly for 6 months after a shock. Change in QoL and shock anxiety was analyzed used linear mixed models for repeated measures. Results: Both the EQ-5D health score and FSAS score were higher in Asian patients compared to patients in the other countries post-implant (EQ-5D: 69.5 ± 18.3 points vs 66.5 ± 19.3 points, p<0.0001, FSAS: 19.7 ± 9.4 points vs 16.4 ± 7.7 points, p<0.0001), and stayed higher for the entire follow-up period (Figure 1). The EQ-5D health score was significantly reduced after a shock (Asian: -18.1 points, p<0.0001; other countries: -7.5 points, p<0.0001) with a greater reduction in Asian patients (p=0.0035) . Recovery in the month following a shock was greater in Asian patients (+19.8 vs +3.6 points, p<0.0001). The FSAS score was significantly increased after a shock (Asian: +6.4 points, p<0.0001; other countries: +4.8 points, p<0.0001) and the increase was similar between geographies (p=0.20). The recovery effect at 1 month was greater in Asian patients (-5.8 vs -1.7 points, p=0.0003) (Figure 2). Conclusions Asian patients were more anxious about a shock in spite of greater QoL, compared with those in other countries. After a shock, Asian patients had a greater decrease in QoL and a similar increase in anxiety but recovery was greater in both measures in the month following a shock.Figure 1Figure 2

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.720
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of quality of life and ICD shock-related anxiety in Asian patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the PainFree SST study

Albert Meijer, Edward J. Schloss, Gavin Bart, Samuel F. Sears et al.
European Heart Journal
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Assessment of quality of life and ICD shock-related anxiety in Asian patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the PainFree SST study

Albert Meijer, Edward J. Schloss, Gavin Bart, Samuel F. Sears, Angelo Auricchio, Takashi Kurita, Laurence D. Sterns, Yusuke Kondo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) reduces mortality in patients at risk of sudden cardiac death. However, it is not known if the psychological status of ICD patients differs by geography. The aim of this analysis is to compare Quality of Life (QoL) and ICD shock-related anxiety between ICD patients in Asian with those in other countries. Methods The PainFree SST study was a prospective, multicenter, global study that enrolled 2770 patients including 225 from from Asia (181 from Japan, 25 from India, and 19 from Malaysia). The EuroQol 5-D (EQ-5D) measured QoL and the Florida Shock Anxiety Scale (FSAS) measured ICD shock-related anxiety. These questionnaires were administered bi-annually and monthly for 6 months after a shock. Change in QoL and shock anxiety was analyzed used linear mixed models for repeated measures. Results: Both the EQ-5D health score and FSAS score were higher in Asian patients compared to patients in the other countries post-implant (EQ-5D: 69.5 ± 18.3 points vs 66.5 ± 19.3 points, p<0.0001, FSAS: 19.7 ± 9.4 points vs 16.4 ± 7.7 points, p<0.0001), and stayed higher for the entire follow-up period (Figure 1). The EQ-5D health score was significantly reduced after a shock (Asian: -18.1 points, p<0.0001; other countries: -7.5 points, p<0.0001) with a greater reduction in Asian patients (p=0.0035) . Recovery in the month following a shock was greater in Asian patients (+19.8 vs +3.6 points, p<0.0001). The FSAS score was significantly increased after a shock (Asian: +6.4 points, p<0.0001; other countries: +4.8 points, p<0.0001) and the increase was similar between geographies (p=0.20). The recovery effect at 1 month was greater in Asian patients (-5.8 vs -1.7 points, p=0.0003) (Figure 2). Conclusions Asian patients were more anxious about a shock in spite of greater QoL, compared with those in other countries. After a shock, Asian patients had a greater decrease in QoL and a similar increase in anxiety but recovery was greater in both measures in the month following a shock.Figure 1Figure 2

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Chiba University (JP), East Carolina University (US), Catharina Ziekenhuis (NL), Royal Jubilee Hospital (CA), Medtronic (Ireland) (IE), Kindai University Hospital (JP), Epatocentro Ticino (CH), Christ University (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.