Resting heart rate and outcomes in patients with heart failure: impact of AF from the Thai-Heat Failure Registry (THFR - HRAF study)

Abstract Introduction Heart rate (HR) is a significant prognosis factor and target of the treatment in patients with heart failure (HF) but this relationship in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is uncertain. Methods A total of 2,996 patients with HF were enroll in the Thai-Heart Failure registry between 2023 to 2024, from 37 heart failure clinics in Thailand. Patients were classified by resting HR and whether having AF or not. The primary outcomes are all-cause death and/or HF. The continuous prognostic relationship and interaction were determined by Cubic-spline model. Results Total of 2,932 patients with available resting heart rate and AF status were analyzed (mean age 59.3±14.5 years, 67.9% male, mean LVEF 31.9%, 12.4% having AF). There were 273, 1,497, 895 and 267 patients have HR <60, 60-80, 80-100 and >100 bpm, respectively. From the lowest HR to the highest group, the all-cause death and/or HF were 16.5%, 10.4% 13.7% and 14.0%. Interestingly, the patients in the lowest, high and highest HR group were associated with poorer outcomes when compared to patients with normal HR (60-80 bpm). (p <0.001, 0.004 and 0.033, respectively). There were no statistic significances in patient with LVEF >40% (p= 0.37, 0.48 and 0.41, respectively). The hazard ratio is lowest between 64 to 91 bpm. The relationship is the same in patient with AF (p for interaction 0.071) but higher hazard ratio at any giving heart rate. Conclusion The normal heart rate (between 60-80 bpm) is associated with the best outcomes, not lower is better. HR is a significant prognosis factor whether having AF or not. The relationship is mainly in patient with HFrEF.Figure

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.936
Primary Topic
Heart rate and cardiovascular health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resting heart rate and outcomes in patients with heart failure: impact of AF from the Thai-Heat Failure Registry (THFR - HRAF study)

Thoranis Chantrarat, Wattana Wongtheptien, R Krittayaphong, Ply Chichareon et al.
European Heart Journal
Heart rate and cardiovascular health
article

Resting heart rate and outcomes in patients with heart failure: impact of AF from the Thai-Heat Failure Registry (THFR - HRAF study)

Thoranis Chantrarat, Wattana Wongtheptien, R Krittayaphong, Ply Chichareon, Srisakul Chirakarnjanakorn, Rungsrit Kanjanavanich, Aekarach Ariyachaipanich, Chalongchai Thundee, S Boonyaratavej-Songmuang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Heart rate (HR) is a significant prognosis factor and target of the treatment in patients with heart failure (HF) but this relationship in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is uncertain. Methods A total of 2,996 patients with HF were enroll in the Thai-Heart Failure registry between 2023 to 2024, from 37 heart failure clinics in Thailand. Patients were classified by resting HR and whether having AF or not. The primary outcomes are all-cause death and/or HF. The continuous prognostic relationship and interaction were determined by Cubic-spline model. Results Total of 2,932 patients with available resting heart rate and AF status were analyzed (mean age 59.3±14.5 years, 67.9% male, mean LVEF 31.9%, 12.4% having AF). There were 273, 1,497, 895 and 267 patients have HR <60, 60-80, 80-100 and >100 bpm, respectively. From the lowest HR to the highest group, the all-cause death and/or HF were 16.5%, 10.4% 13.7% and 14.0%. Interestingly, the patients in the lowest, high and highest HR group were associated with poorer outcomes when compared to patients with normal HR (60-80 bpm). (p <0.001, 0.004 and 0.033, respectively). There were no statistic significances in patient with LVEF >40% (p= 0.37, 0.48 and 0.41, respectively). The hazard ratio is lowest between 64 to 91 bpm. The relationship is the same in patient with AF (p for interaction 0.071) but higher hazard ratio at any giving heart rate. Conclusion The normal heart rate (between 60-80 bpm) is associated with the best outcomes, not lower is better. HR is a significant prognosis factor whether having AF or not. The relationship is mainly in patient with HFrEF.Figure

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Prince of Songkla University (TH), Siriraj Hospital (TH), Chulalongkorn University (TH), Mahidol University (TH), Phramongkutklao Hospital (TH), ChiangRai Prachanukroh Hospital (TH), Surin Hospital (TH), Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Chiang Mai University (TH)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Heart rate and cardiovascular health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.