Development of an automated process for monitoring of amiodarone treatment

Abstract Background Amiodarone treatment requires repeated laboratory evaluations of thyroid and liver function due to risk of side effects during long-term administration. Robotic process automation (RPA) represents the use of software robots to automate repetitive and routine tasks typically performed by humans. Purpose We aimed to develop an RPA using a diagnostic classification algorithm and clinical support system for follow-up of amiodarone treatment. Methods Based on international guidelines and clinical specialist advisory we constructed an RPA which was studied in a test environment in parallel with routine amiodarone treatment. Expert advice was integrated through a series of collaborative workshops, ensuring alignment of the algorithm with current best practices in thyroid and liver disease management. The RPA provided recommendations on the time interval to next laboratory testing and suggestions for patient management to the physician, who was serving as a human-in-the-loop responsible for clinical decisions. Results After iterative improvements the RPA was evaluated against physician orders (n=390 paired orders) without technical failures. The recommended time interval to next follow-up was (mean ± SD) 4.5 ± 2.4 vs. 3.1 ± 1.4 months for RPA vs. physician (p<0.0001). While normal laboratory findings resulted in recommended follow-up in 6 months by the RPA (72.2%) this was only ordered in 9.9% by the physician (Figure). Physicians’ orders clustered between 3-4 months (58.5%). All patients diagnosed with new side effects (n=12) were detected and communicated correctly by the RPA, whereas only 8 were correctly detected and responded to by the physician (Table). Conclusions An automated process constitutes a reliable alternative to the current fully manual management of amiodarone follow-up. It may reduce manual labour, frequency of laboratory testing and detect side effects with increased precision, thereby reducing costs and enhancing patient value. While the RPA shows promise, further research is needed to explore its adaptability to other treatment scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.3519
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of an automated process for monitoring of amiodarone treatment

Nikolaos Papachrysos, Martin Lindgren, Birgitta Johansson, Jonas Landahl et al.
1 citations
European Heart Journal
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
0.29
article

Development of an automated process for monitoring of amiodarone treatment

Nikolaos Papachrysos, Martin Lindgren, Birgitta Johansson, Jonas Landahl, Karin Tammelin, Helén Sjöland, A Rosengren, Helena Filipsson Nyström
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Amiodarone treatment requires repeated laboratory evaluations of thyroid and liver function due to risk of side effects during long-term administration. Robotic process automation (RPA) represents the use of software robots to automate repetitive and routine tasks typically performed by humans. Purpose We aimed to develop an RPA using a diagnostic classification algorithm and clinical support system for follow-up of amiodarone treatment. Methods Based on international guidelines and clinical specialist advisory we constructed an RPA which was studied in a test environment in parallel with routine amiodarone treatment. Expert advice was integrated through a series of collaborative workshops, ensuring alignment of the algorithm with current best practices in thyroid and liver disease management. The RPA provided recommendations on the time interval to next laboratory testing and suggestions for patient management to the physician, who was serving as a human-in-the-loop responsible for clinical decisions. Results After iterative improvements the RPA was evaluated against physician orders (n=390 paired orders) without technical failures. The recommended time interval to next follow-up was (mean ± SD) 4.5 ± 2.4 vs. 3.1 ± 1.4 months for RPA vs. physician (p<0.0001). While normal laboratory findings resulted in recommended follow-up in 6 months by the RPA (72.2%) this was only ordered in 9.9% by the physician (Figure). Physicians’ orders clustered between 3-4 months (58.5%). All patients diagnosed with new side effects (n=12) were detected and communicated correctly by the RPA, whereas only 8 were correctly detected and responded to by the physician (Table). Conclusions An automated process constitutes a reliable alternative to the current fully manual management of amiodarone follow-up. It may reduce manual labour, frequency of laboratory testing and detect side effects with increased precision, thereby reducing costs and enhancing patient value. While the RPA shows promise, further research is needed to explore its adaptability to other treatment scenarios.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
0.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.