Overcoming non-usage of e-mental health: A qualitative study in a Dutch general practice

Abstract Background Worldwide percentages of people with mental health problems are substantial and increased during the COVID pandemic (to about 25 % in the general population). E-mental health has potential to help with waiting lists, rising health care costs and work pressure. To reach the desired effects, participants need to use the technology as intended. Non-usage though is a common problem. Research question is: what elements obstruct the intention to use e-mental Health interventions, plus what are barriers to bridging the intention-behaviour gap? Methods In a qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted (interview guide). We recruited patients who were invited for an e-mental health intervention in a Dutch general practice but did not start the intervention. Data saturation occurred with 11 patients. Open, axial and selective coding was done on the transcribed interviews using the software ATLAS.ti. Results Five main themes were associated with non-use: 1) ‘Expectations about the eHealth in general’ were neutral to positive. 2) ‘thresholds to start e-mental health’ were: negative expectations about the content, lacking mental capacity due to mental problems, missing personal contact, the therapy with the mental health professional in general did not fit their needs or aversion towards more screen time. 3) ‘lack of planning’. 4) lacking encouragement from mental health professional 5) ‘Expectations from therapy in general’. (a.o. face-to-face contact and tailoring) Conclusions Embedding the e-mental health more into regular therapy has potential to overcome non-usage. The mental health care professional has social influence to increase usage, by a clear and convincing introduction plus joint review of the exercises during consultations. This study needs to be repeated in other clinical settings. Future research should also include age (computer use) and disease prognosis to define when e-mental health is a suitable solution for patients. Key messages • E-mental health interventions have potential to help with waiting lists, rising health care costs and workload, but non usage is a problem. • Embedding the e-mental health more into regular therapy has potential to overcome non-usage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1625
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Overcoming non-usage of e-mental health: A qualitative study in a Dutch general practice

C.M. van der Heijde, Peter Vonk, J D Van Winkoop
European Journal of Public Health
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Overcoming non-usage of e-mental health: A qualitative study in a Dutch general practice

C.M. van der Heijde, Peter Vonk, J D Van Winkoop
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Worldwide percentages of people with mental health problems are substantial and increased during the COVID pandemic (to about 25 % in the general population). E-mental health has potential to help with waiting lists, rising health care costs and work pressure. To reach the desired effects, participants need to use the technology as intended. Non-usage though is a common problem. Research question is: what elements obstruct the intention to use e-mental Health interventions, plus what are barriers to bridging the intention-behaviour gap? Methods In a qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted (interview guide). We recruited patients who were invited for an e-mental health intervention in a Dutch general practice but did not start the intervention. Data saturation occurred with 11 patients. Open, axial and selective coding was done on the transcribed interviews using the software ATLAS.ti. Results Five main themes were associated with non-use: 1) ‘Expectations about the eHealth in general’ were neutral to positive. 2) ‘thresholds to start e-mental health’ were: negative expectations about the content, lacking mental capacity due to mental problems, missing personal contact, the therapy with the mental health professional in general did not fit their needs or aversion towards more screen time. 3) ‘lack of planning’. 4) lacking encouragement from mental health professional 5) ‘Expectations from therapy in general’. (a.o. face-to-face contact and tailoring) Conclusions Embedding the e-mental health more into regular therapy has potential to overcome non-usage. The mental health care professional has social influence to increase usage, by a clear and convincing introduction plus joint review of the exercises during consultations. This study needs to be repeated in other clinical settings. Future research should also include age (computer use) and disease prognosis to define when e-mental health is a suitable solution for patients. Key messages • E-mental health interventions have potential to help with waiting lists, rising health care costs and workload, but non usage is a problem. • Embedding the e-mental health more into regular therapy has potential to overcome non-usage.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.