Digital Public Health and Digital Health: twins or Neighbors? A data protection perspective

Abstract Enhancing digital public health (DiPH) terminology may foster a better understanding of the legal framework that grounds the use of personal health data within and outside public health policy and public health systems. Terminology accuracy is, therefore, relevant to understanding the data protection regulations that apply to DiPH interventions. The broader or narrower possibilities for using personal health data in digital health interventions depend on the legal basis that justifies (or not) the access to personal health data, whether inside public health policy or outside (e.g., in private health companies). In the context of digital health policy for DiPH, using personal health data is based on public law, analyzing proportionality, necessity, and the legitimacy of the interest. In contrast, for digital health interventions outside public health policy or in an individual clinical approach (like in digital health), the use of personal health data is based on informed consent. Brazilian data protection law (LGPD) and European GDPR provide the legal basis for public health systems’ use of health data in health policy. As a result, the DiPH approach highlights the relevance of using digital technologies and health data to strengthen public health systems within the platform economy and the context of surveillance capitalism. This presentation will shed light on the expansion of digital technologies and health data in health policy in the face of data science, highlighting the need to delve into the terminology of DiPH, understanding its boundaries and legal differences from its neighbors (not twins) outside health policy. Clarifying the DiPH approach, potentially leading to standards in terminology and embedding a data protection perspective, may maximize the accuracy of the legal justification for personal health data use in health policies. DiPH, therefore, may foster data protection, public health systems, and policies strengthening with health data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.133
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Public Health and Digital Health: twins or Neighbors? A data protection perspective

M Ventura, Anabelle Macedo Silva
1 citations
European Journal of Public Health
Ethics in Clinical Research
0.54
article

Digital Public Health and Digital Health: twins or Neighbors? A data protection perspective

M Ventura, Anabelle Macedo Silva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Enhancing digital public health (DiPH) terminology may foster a better understanding of the legal framework that grounds the use of personal health data within and outside public health policy and public health systems. Terminology accuracy is, therefore, relevant to understanding the data protection regulations that apply to DiPH interventions. The broader or narrower possibilities for using personal health data in digital health interventions depend on the legal basis that justifies (or not) the access to personal health data, whether inside public health policy or outside (e.g., in private health companies). In the context of digital health policy for DiPH, using personal health data is based on public law, analyzing proportionality, necessity, and the legitimacy of the interest. In contrast, for digital health interventions outside public health policy or in an individual clinical approach (like in digital health), the use of personal health data is based on informed consent. Brazilian data protection law (LGPD) and European GDPR provide the legal basis for public health systems’ use of health data in health policy. As a result, the DiPH approach highlights the relevance of using digital technologies and health data to strengthen public health systems within the platform economy and the context of surveillance capitalism. This presentation will shed light on the expansion of digital technologies and health data in health policy in the face of data science, highlighting the need to delve into the terminology of DiPH, understanding its boundaries and legal differences from its neighbors (not twins) outside health policy. Clarifying the DiPH approach, potentially leading to standards in terminology and embedding a data protection perspective, may maximize the accuracy of the legal justification for personal health data use in health policies. DiPH, therefore, may foster data protection, public health systems, and policies strengthening with health data.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ethics in Clinical Research
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digital Public Health and Digital Health: twins or Neighbors? A data protection perspective — M Ventura, Anabelle Macedo Silva · European Journal of Public Health (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS