Health selection in three cohorts of outmigrants, return migrants and non-migrants

Abstract Background The two main hypotheses behind the healthy migrant effect are selection of healthier migrants and the salmon bias. However, these hypotheses have not been thoroughly and simultaneously investigated in distinct cohorts due to data limitations. Methods Linking national and provincial immigration registers with health care utilization datasets at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, we assembled a cohort of 816,185 adults who resided in Manitoba, Canada and were followed up for at least one year between 1985 to 2023 to outmigration, return migration or death. We included three subcohorts of international immigrants (16.4%), interprovincial migrants (10.8%) and all other Manitobans (AOM) (72.8%). Within each subcohort, we matched ‘stayers’ who never migrated, outmigrants and returnees on sex, birth year and place of residence and compared their hospitalization rates and Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity scores 1-year before outmigration and 1-year after return migration. Results Outmigrants had lower hospitalization rates than stayers among AOM [Adjusted Relative Rate (RR): 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78, 0.82] and in the other two subcohorts. Comorbidity scores were also consistently lower among outmigrants compared to stayers in all three subcohorts, even after restricting to hospitalized cases. Outmigrants whose destination was another country were healthier than those who migrated to other provinces. Returnees had better health status than stayers upon return in the AOM subcohort only but lower than those who did not return at the time of outmigration in all three subcohorts. Conclusions Contrary to common belief, health selection is not restricted to international immigrants but also among interprovincial migrants and the local population. Migration dynamics may bias comparisons between population subgroups. Key messages • Migration is not only associated with positive health selection among international immigrants but also among interprovincial migrants and the local population. • Selective migration may represent a source of bias in health-related population-based studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.939
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health selection in three cohorts of outmigrants, return migrants and non-migrants

Shantanu Debbarman, Marcelo L. Urquía, Gilles R. Detillieux
European Journal of Public Health
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

Health selection in three cohorts of outmigrants, return migrants and non-migrants

Shantanu Debbarman, Marcelo L. Urquía, Gilles R. Detillieux
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The two main hypotheses behind the healthy migrant effect are selection of healthier migrants and the salmon bias. However, these hypotheses have not been thoroughly and simultaneously investigated in distinct cohorts due to data limitations. Methods Linking national and provincial immigration registers with health care utilization datasets at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, we assembled a cohort of 816,185 adults who resided in Manitoba, Canada and were followed up for at least one year between 1985 to 2023 to outmigration, return migration or death. We included three subcohorts of international immigrants (16.4%), interprovincial migrants (10.8%) and all other Manitobans (AOM) (72.8%). Within each subcohort, we matched ‘stayers’ who never migrated, outmigrants and returnees on sex, birth year and place of residence and compared their hospitalization rates and Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity scores 1-year before outmigration and 1-year after return migration. Results Outmigrants had lower hospitalization rates than stayers among AOM [Adjusted Relative Rate (RR): 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78, 0.82] and in the other two subcohorts. Comorbidity scores were also consistently lower among outmigrants compared to stayers in all three subcohorts, even after restricting to hospitalized cases. Outmigrants whose destination was another country were healthier than those who migrated to other provinces. Returnees had better health status than stayers upon return in the AOM subcohort only but lower than those who did not return at the time of outmigration in all three subcohorts. Conclusions Contrary to common belief, health selection is not restricted to international immigrants but also among interprovincial migrants and the local population. Migration dynamics may bias comparisons between population subgroups. Key messages • Migration is not only associated with positive health selection among international immigrants but also among interprovincial migrants and the local population. • Selective migration may represent a source of bias in health-related population-based studies.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Manitoba Health (CA), University of Manitoba (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.