Institutional Discrimination in Health Security Policies against Immigrants in South Korea

Abstract Background South Korea is poised to become Asia’s first mult-iethnic society with over 5% of its population, totaling more than 2.5 million, being immigrants. This demographic shift presents significant public health challenges linked to widespread, and even intensifying, institutional discrimination in healthcare services. Methods This study reviews discriminatory practices across ten essential health security programs, including National Health Insurance (NHI) system, disability assistance, occupational health services, maternal and child care services, national immunization program, health screening program, and assistance for catastrophic medical expenses. Government data and personal narratives were also reviewed to identify the discriminatory elements that can have significant consequences, including increased disease prevalence, higher incidence of occupational injuries, and broader socio-economic instability among migrants. Results Discriminatory elements were found in most programs, with the exception of emergency medical services. These programs commonly provide fewer benefits or impose stricter eligibility criteria for migrants compared to nationals. In particular, the Korean NHI system demands migrants to pay higher premiums and more rigorous maintenance requirements. Conclusions The findings emphasize the need for urgent reforms to equalize health insurance costs, simplify eligibility criteria for migrants, and broaden the scope of benefits to encompass all residency statuses. Implementing these changes will enhance public health infrastructure, improve occupational safety, and foster better integration of the diverse population, ultimately promoting social cohesion and a fairer health system for all. Key messages • A number of discriminatory elements against migrants have been identified in South Korea’s social security policies that can exacerbate health disparities. • Reforms are needed to expand benefits and relax eligibility criteria for migrants in key healthcare policies, including the National Health Insurance system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.2038
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional Discrimination in Health Security Policies against Immigrants in South Korea

Sun‐Seog Kweon, Joshua Kim, Moo-Jin Baek, Youngkeun Choi
2 citations
European Journal of Public Health
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
2.26
article

Institutional Discrimination in Health Security Policies against Immigrants in South Korea

Sun‐Seog Kweon, Joshua Kim, Moo-Jin Baek, Youngkeun Choi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background South Korea is poised to become Asia’s first mult-iethnic society with over 5% of its population, totaling more than 2.5 million, being immigrants. This demographic shift presents significant public health challenges linked to widespread, and even intensifying, institutional discrimination in healthcare services. Methods This study reviews discriminatory practices across ten essential health security programs, including National Health Insurance (NHI) system, disability assistance, occupational health services, maternal and child care services, national immunization program, health screening program, and assistance for catastrophic medical expenses. Government data and personal narratives were also reviewed to identify the discriminatory elements that can have significant consequences, including increased disease prevalence, higher incidence of occupational injuries, and broader socio-economic instability among migrants. Results Discriminatory elements were found in most programs, with the exception of emergency medical services. These programs commonly provide fewer benefits or impose stricter eligibility criteria for migrants compared to nationals. In particular, the Korean NHI system demands migrants to pay higher premiums and more rigorous maintenance requirements. Conclusions The findings emphasize the need for urgent reforms to equalize health insurance costs, simplify eligibility criteria for migrants, and broaden the scope of benefits to encompass all residency statuses. Implementing these changes will enhance public health infrastructure, improve occupational safety, and foster better integration of the diverse population, ultimately promoting social cohesion and a fairer health system for all. Key messages • A number of discriminatory elements against migrants have been identified in South Korea’s social security policies that can exacerbate health disparities. • Reforms are needed to expand benefits and relax eligibility criteria for migrants in key healthcare policies, including the National Health Insurance system.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Gwangju Health University (KR), Regional Cancer Center (US), Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital (KR), Institute of Public Health Zadar (HR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.