A Personal Health Record for patients with multiple sclerosis: A 2-year evaluation study

Abstract Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease impacting the central nervous system, affecting 2.8 million people worldwide. Effective self-management is crucial for treating chronic diseases, including MS. Personal health records (PHRs) show promise in supporting self-management, potentially empowering patients and enhancing their engagement in treatment and health. However, implementation challenges persist. Objectives This study aimed to) assess the feasibility and usability of the PHR according to patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs), and 2) evaluate implementation determinants, and exploring preliminary effects on a range of outcomes related to the quality, efficiency, and costs of care, as well as health-related outcomes. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted in a Dutch hospital. Quantitative data from 80 patients and 12 HCPs were collected via questionnaires at baseline (T0), after one (T1) and 2 years (T2). Focus group interview were conducted at T2 with 7 patients and 4 HCPs. Results Most patients never logged in during the first year and logged in a couple of times during the second year, with 15 minutes per log-in session. The HCPs mainly logged in a couple of times per year, averaging six minutes per session. Patients’ and HCPs’ usability and satisfaction scores were below average and moderate respectively. Various facilitators and barriers were identified, including knowledge gaps, staff capacity issues, and ICT obstacles. No significant differences were found in preliminary effects. Qualitative data highlighted benefits in terms of gaining insight into health data but revealed challenges with log-in issues and information retrieval. Conclusions Implementation challenges hindered PHR adoption. The evolving nature of PHRs requires ongoing evaluation and adaptation to optimize their potential benefits. Utilizing a participatory design approach and a dedicated implementation team could enhance adoption and maximize benefits. Key messages • A personal health record (PHR) for patients with MS was evaluated within the care setting of a Dutch hospital, demonstrating limited usability and moderate satisfaction. • Diverse obstacles impeded the adoption and uptake of the PHR, but potential solutions lie in continuous development with a participatory design approach and dedicated implementation team.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1577
Primary Topic
Family Support in Illness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Personal Health Record for patients with multiple sclerosis: A 2-year evaluation study

Niels Henrik Chavannes, M. Elske van den Akker‐van Marle, Jiska Joëlle Aardoom, Elske Hoitsma et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Family Support in Illness
article

A Personal Health Record for patients with multiple sclerosis: A 2-year evaluation study

Niels Henrik Chavannes, M. Elske van den Akker‐van Marle, Jiska Joëlle Aardoom, Elske Hoitsma, Liselot N van den Berg, Léone E. Kiveron
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease impacting the central nervous system, affecting 2.8 million people worldwide. Effective self-management is crucial for treating chronic diseases, including MS. Personal health records (PHRs) show promise in supporting self-management, potentially empowering patients and enhancing their engagement in treatment and health. However, implementation challenges persist. Objectives This study aimed to) assess the feasibility and usability of the PHR according to patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs), and 2) evaluate implementation determinants, and exploring preliminary effects on a range of outcomes related to the quality, efficiency, and costs of care, as well as health-related outcomes. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted in a Dutch hospital. Quantitative data from 80 patients and 12 HCPs were collected via questionnaires at baseline (T0), after one (T1) and 2 years (T2). Focus group interview were conducted at T2 with 7 patients and 4 HCPs. Results Most patients never logged in during the first year and logged in a couple of times during the second year, with 15 minutes per log-in session. The HCPs mainly logged in a couple of times per year, averaging six minutes per session. Patients’ and HCPs’ usability and satisfaction scores were below average and moderate respectively. Various facilitators and barriers were identified, including knowledge gaps, staff capacity issues, and ICT obstacles. No significant differences were found in preliminary effects. Qualitative data highlighted benefits in terms of gaining insight into health data but revealed challenges with log-in issues and information retrieval. Conclusions Implementation challenges hindered PHR adoption. The evolving nature of PHRs requires ongoing evaluation and adaptation to optimize their potential benefits. Utilizing a participatory design approach and a dedicated implementation team could enhance adoption and maximize benefits. Key messages • A personal health record (PHR) for patients with MS was evaluated within the care setting of a Dutch hospital, demonstrating limited usability and moderate satisfaction. • Diverse obstacles impeded the adoption and uptake of the PHR, but potential solutions lie in continuous development with a participatory design approach and dedicated implementation team.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Alrijne Ziekenhuis (NL)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Family Support in Illness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.