Integrity and accountability in academic publishing: trends and implications of paper retractions and journal delistings

Abstract In the context of academic publishing, ‘retraction’ refers to the withdrawal of a published article from the scientific record due to issues such as significant errors, plagiarism, fraudulent data, or unethical research practices. Retractions play a critical role in maintaining the integrity of scientific literature. Retraction Watch, a blog that tracks retractions of scientific papers, lists more than 48,000 retractions in its database, with increasing trend over time (from 450 reported retractions in 2008 to a staggering 7327 retractions in 2023). The extent to which this indicates a heightened vigilance in identifying problematic research or an increased tendency in committing research misconduct or errors is unclear. Retractions can have lasting consequences beyond the retracted paper itself for authors, editors, publishers and the scientific community at large. However, not all retractions are the same, and self-reporting errors might come with minimal effects, suggesting a recognition of accountability and corrective actions. Delisting of a journal from a scientific database such as Scopus and Web of Science refers to the removal of the journal from the database’s index. This can happen for various reasons, including quality concerns and ethical issues. Although this phenomenon is not necessarily correlated with the quality, integrity, or reliability of individual papers published in the delisted journal, it might still have significant impacts on the work and careers of researchers. For instance, articles in delisted journals might suffer from decreased visibility or authors might not be able to use it for promotions. The curated list of sources from Scopus is publicly available and lists around 800 discountinued sources due to quality concerns, while Web of Science made the news in 2023 for the delisting of several journals for editorial reasons, including the MDPI’s giant, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.678
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrity and accountability in academic publishing: trends and implications of paper retractions and journal delistings

A M Pezzullo, Angelica Valz Gris, A Cristiano
1 citations
European Journal of Public Health
Academic integrity and plagiarism
0.53
article

Integrity and accountability in academic publishing: trends and implications of paper retractions and journal delistings

A M Pezzullo, Angelica Valz Gris, A Cristiano
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the context of academic publishing, ‘retraction’ refers to the withdrawal of a published article from the scientific record due to issues such as significant errors, plagiarism, fraudulent data, or unethical research practices. Retractions play a critical role in maintaining the integrity of scientific literature. Retraction Watch, a blog that tracks retractions of scientific papers, lists more than 48,000 retractions in its database, with increasing trend over time (from 450 reported retractions in 2008 to a staggering 7327 retractions in 2023). The extent to which this indicates a heightened vigilance in identifying problematic research or an increased tendency in committing research misconduct or errors is unclear. Retractions can have lasting consequences beyond the retracted paper itself for authors, editors, publishers and the scientific community at large. However, not all retractions are the same, and self-reporting errors might come with minimal effects, suggesting a recognition of accountability and corrective actions. Delisting of a journal from a scientific database such as Scopus and Web of Science refers to the removal of the journal from the database’s index. This can happen for various reasons, including quality concerns and ethical issues. Although this phenomenon is not necessarily correlated with the quality, integrity, or reliability of individual papers published in the delisted journal, it might still have significant impacts on the work and careers of researchers. For instance, articles in delisted journals might suffer from decreased visibility or authors might not be able to use it for promotions. The curated list of sources from Scopus is publicly available and lists around 800 discountinued sources due to quality concerns, while Web of Science made the news in 2023 for the delisting of several journals for editorial reasons, including the MDPI’s giant, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Innovative Research (United States) (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.