2.B. Scientific session: Learning from intercountry comparisons in digital healthcare transition monitoring

Abstract In many countries, healthcare is facing several challenges, including increasing healthcare demand, healthcare workforce shortages, rising healthcare costs, and keeping healthcare accessible. It is thought that the use of digital health might help to tackle these challenges. However, digital health programs and interventions are often not (systematically) monitored or evaluated. Monitoring of the digital healthcare transition in countries over time helps policymakers and healthcare professionals to investigate which digital services work well, and which do not, to (partly) solve the experienced challenges. In Europe, several countries monitor the digital healthcare transition within the primary and secondary care in their country. Comparing and sharing the monitoring methodologies between countries and describing the current state of the digital healthcare transition in primary and secondary care, will help to learn from other countries about how digital health could help to tackle the frequently experienced healthcare challenges. During this workshop, three countries throughout Europe (the Netherlands, Italy and Denmark) will briefly share their methodologies used for monitoring the digital healthcare transition in their country and will provide an up-to-date overview of the current state of the digital healthcare transition in primary and secondary care in their country. Challenges, achievements and future plans for the monitoring of this transition will also be shortly discussed in 10-minute presentations. Further, there will be 25 minutes for audience interaction which will be moderated by the chairperson. During this discussion, there is time to hear experiences from other countries and explore best practices in monitoring the digital healthcare transition. Key messages • The digital healthcare transition can be monitored in different ways. Experiences from three European countries may inspire others to organize national monitoring programs. • The speed and nature of the digital healthcare transition differs between European countries. Experiences from three European countries provide insight into state of the art of national transitions.

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.072
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

2.B. Scientific session: Learning from intercountry comparisons in digital healthcare transition monitoring

European Journal of Public Health
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

2.B. Scientific session: Learning from intercountry comparisons in digital healthcare transition monitoring

article en

Abstract

Abstract In many countries, healthcare is facing several challenges, including increasing healthcare demand, healthcare workforce shortages, rising healthcare costs, and keeping healthcare accessible. It is thought that the use of digital health might help to tackle these challenges. However, digital health programs and interventions are often not (systematically) monitored or evaluated. Monitoring of the digital healthcare transition in countries over time helps policymakers and healthcare professionals to investigate which digital services work well, and which do not, to (partly) solve the experienced challenges. In Europe, several countries monitor the digital healthcare transition within the primary and secondary care in their country. Comparing and sharing the monitoring methodologies between countries and describing the current state of the digital healthcare transition in primary and secondary care, will help to learn from other countries about how digital health could help to tackle the frequently experienced healthcare challenges. During this workshop, three countries throughout Europe (the Netherlands, Italy and Denmark) will briefly share their methodologies used for monitoring the digital healthcare transition in their country and will provide an up-to-date overview of the current state of the digital healthcare transition in primary and secondary care in their country. Challenges, achievements and future plans for the monitoring of this transition will also be shortly discussed in 10-minute presentations. Further, there will be 25 minutes for audience interaction which will be moderated by the chairperson. During this discussion, there is time to hear experiences from other countries and explore best practices in monitoring the digital healthcare transition. Key messages • The digital healthcare transition can be monitored in different ways. Experiences from three European countries may inspire others to organize national monitoring programs. • The speed and nature of the digital healthcare transition differs between European countries. Experiences from three European countries provide insight into state of the art of national transitions.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.