From hesitancy to decision: shifts from intentions to uptake of Influenza and COVID-19 vaccines

Abstract Background Vaccine hesitancy is context-related and risks coverage. In a context of growing hesitancy, this study aims to characterize and identify factors underlying shifts in Influenza and COVID-19 vaccines intention and uptake. Methods Questionnaires were administered to a random sample of the 60+ years old Portuguese population (n = 1400), before (Q1) and at the end of the campaign (Q2). Sociodemographic, clinical data and intention to Influenza/COVID-19 vaccine uptake, using a Likert-scale (0-2: refusal; 3-7: hesitancy; 8-10: acceptance), were assessed on Q1. On Q2, self-reported vaccination status and motives. A logistic regression was performed to identify underlying factors. Results COVID-19 vaccine: 26.2% of those reporting acceptance went for non-uptake (214/818), stating low susceptibility/severity and fear of side effects. Factors associated were not having chronic disease (OR 2.07, p<.05) and age 60-64 (OR 4.16, p<.05). 25.5% of those who refuse went for vaccine uptake (27/106), stating self-initiative. Age 65 + (OR 43.82, p<.05) was associated with the shift; 56.4% of the hesitant individuals went for non-uptake (154/273). Higher education associates with non-uptake (OR 0.53, p<.05). Influenza vaccine: 11.5% of reported acceptance went for non-uptake (100/873), stating low susceptibility/severity. Associated factors were age 60-64 (OR 5.85, p<.05), not having chronic diseases (OR 2.64, p<.05) and living alone (OR 2.34, p<.05). 23.4% of those refusing decided for vaccine uptake (29/124), stating self-initiative/risk awareness. Associated factor was age 60-64 (OR 6.41, p<.05). 69.5% of hesitancy went for uptake (139/200). Chronic disease associates with non-uptake (OR 0.26, p<.05). Conclusions Intention is a good predictor but not decisive for uptake. This research provides better understanding of shifts in intention versus vaccine uptake, as well as factors and motives for hesitancy, allowing more robust interventions ahead of a vaccination campaign. Key messages • For the Influenza vaccine, 13% of individuals reporting acceptance or refusal changed their mind. From the group reporting hesitancy, 70% decided for vaccine uptake. • For the COVID-19 vaccine, 26% of individuals reporting acceptance or refusal changed their mind. From the group reporting hesitancy, 56% decided for non-vaccine uptake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1037
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From hesitancy to decision: shifts from intentions to uptake of Influenza and COVID-19 vaccines

Samylla Costa de Moura, Ana Paula Rodrigues, Eduardo Paulino, José Guerreiro et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Public Health
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
0.53
article

From hesitancy to decision: shifts from intentions to uptake of Influenza and COVID-19 vaccines

Samylla Costa de Moura, Ana Paula Rodrigues, Eduardo Paulino, José Guerreiro, S. Romano
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Vaccine hesitancy is context-related and risks coverage. In a context of growing hesitancy, this study aims to characterize and identify factors underlying shifts in Influenza and COVID-19 vaccines intention and uptake. Methods Questionnaires were administered to a random sample of the 60+ years old Portuguese population (n = 1400), before (Q1) and at the end of the campaign (Q2). Sociodemographic, clinical data and intention to Influenza/COVID-19 vaccine uptake, using a Likert-scale (0-2: refusal; 3-7: hesitancy; 8-10: acceptance), were assessed on Q1. On Q2, self-reported vaccination status and motives. A logistic regression was performed to identify underlying factors. Results COVID-19 vaccine: 26.2% of those reporting acceptance went for non-uptake (214/818), stating low susceptibility/severity and fear of side effects. Factors associated were not having chronic disease (OR 2.07, p<.05) and age 60-64 (OR 4.16, p<.05). 25.5% of those who refuse went for vaccine uptake (27/106), stating self-initiative. Age 65 + (OR 43.82, p<.05) was associated with the shift; 56.4% of the hesitant individuals went for non-uptake (154/273). Higher education associates with non-uptake (OR 0.53, p<.05). Influenza vaccine: 11.5% of reported acceptance went for non-uptake (100/873), stating low susceptibility/severity. Associated factors were age 60-64 (OR 5.85, p<.05), not having chronic diseases (OR 2.64, p<.05) and living alone (OR 2.34, p<.05). 23.4% of those refusing decided for vaccine uptake (29/124), stating self-initiative/risk awareness. Associated factor was age 60-64 (OR 6.41, p<.05). 69.5% of hesitancy went for uptake (139/200). Chronic disease associates with non-uptake (OR 0.26, p<.05). Conclusions Intention is a good predictor but not decisive for uptake. This research provides better understanding of shifts in intention versus vaccine uptake, as well as factors and motives for hesitancy, allowing more robust interventions ahead of a vaccination campaign. Key messages • For the Influenza vaccine, 13% of individuals reporting acceptance or refusal changed their mind. From the group reporting hesitancy, 70% decided for vaccine uptake. • For the COVID-19 vaccine, 26% of individuals reporting acceptance or refusal changed their mind. From the group reporting hesitancy, 56% decided for non-vaccine uptake.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Ipca Laboratories (India) (IN), Unidade Local de Saúde de Entre Douro e Vouga (PT), University of Minho (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.