The WHO health system performance assessment applied to child healthcare in Luxembourg, 2011-2022

Abstract Background Health System Performance Assessments (HSPAs) evaluate health systems in terms of their objectives and their overall goals, such as access to quality services and health improvement. Beyond the overall health system assessment, HSPA can evaluate performance in providing care to specific populations. We assessed the response of the Luxembourg health system to children’s particular health needs, by populating the WHO HSPA framework for universal healthcare with child-specific indicators. Methods We searched international databases, guidelines, policy documents, and the scientific literature to identify child-specific indicators suitable for assessing the health system objectives as defined by the WHO HSPA framework. To select the most relevant indicators, we conducted expert appraisal regarding feasibility, validity and actionability. Those indicators were calculated based on available national data. To explore inequities within the system, we performed socioeconomic stratifications. Results Twenty-nine indicators were used to populate the framework, sourced from social security databases (n = 15), monitoring and surveillance (n = 11), and surveys (n = 2). For effectiveness assessment, we used 11 indicators and found that preventive services performed best for children under two years. Five indicators showed good accessibility to primary and secondary care. Another five indicators assessed safety indicating a recent increase in the relative use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials and an overuse of caesarean sections. Additional disaggregation of three indicators didn’t expose socioeconomic inequities in service delivery. Data gaps exist to assess children’s user-experience and financing of child health services. Conclusions The WHO HSPA framework proved valuable for evaluating the Luxembourg health system’s performance for children. We identified good performance in accessibility and effectiveness for young children, alongside data gaps to assess user-experience. Key messages • The application of national child-specific indicators to the WHO health system performance assessment, highlighted strengths in accessibility and effectiveness while also pointing to key data gaps. • We used the WHO health system performance assessment (HSPA) to evaluate the health system for children in Luxembourg. This exercise enhances the development of a tailored national HSPA framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1621
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The WHO health system performance assessment applied to child healthcare in Luxembourg, 2011-2022

Till Seuring, Francoise Berthet, Tanja Ducomble
European Journal of Public Health
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

The WHO health system performance assessment applied to child healthcare in Luxembourg, 2011-2022

Till Seuring, Francoise Berthet, Tanja Ducomble
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Health System Performance Assessments (HSPAs) evaluate health systems in terms of their objectives and their overall goals, such as access to quality services and health improvement. Beyond the overall health system assessment, HSPA can evaluate performance in providing care to specific populations. We assessed the response of the Luxembourg health system to children’s particular health needs, by populating the WHO HSPA framework for universal healthcare with child-specific indicators. Methods We searched international databases, guidelines, policy documents, and the scientific literature to identify child-specific indicators suitable for assessing the health system objectives as defined by the WHO HSPA framework. To select the most relevant indicators, we conducted expert appraisal regarding feasibility, validity and actionability. Those indicators were calculated based on available national data. To explore inequities within the system, we performed socioeconomic stratifications. Results Twenty-nine indicators were used to populate the framework, sourced from social security databases (n = 15), monitoring and surveillance (n = 11), and surveys (n = 2). For effectiveness assessment, we used 11 indicators and found that preventive services performed best for children under two years. Five indicators showed good accessibility to primary and secondary care. Another five indicators assessed safety indicating a recent increase in the relative use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials and an overuse of caesarean sections. Additional disaggregation of three indicators didn’t expose socioeconomic inequities in service delivery. Data gaps exist to assess children’s user-experience and financing of child health services. Conclusions The WHO HSPA framework proved valuable for evaluating the Luxembourg health system’s performance for children. We identified good performance in accessibility and effectiveness for young children, alongside data gaps to assess user-experience. Key messages • The application of national child-specific indicators to the WHO health system performance assessment, highlighted strengths in accessibility and effectiveness while also pointing to key data gaps. • We used the WHO health system performance assessment (HSPA) to evaluate the health system for children in Luxembourg. This exercise enhances the development of a tailored national HSPA framework.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
National Observatory (BR), Laboratoire National de Santé (LU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.