Enhancing port preparedness in Germany in the event of infectious diseases – a best practice study

Abstract Background The maritime sector is exposed to specific risks in the area of communicable diseases. In Germany, five ports are designated to enforce the International Health Regulations (IHR) and must have certain core capacities to respond immediately to cross-border health threats. A joint external evaluation conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO) revealed a need to reinforce central structures in Germany. The overarching objective of the study is to harmonize and consolidate the requisite capacities for maritime health security. Methods Qualitative interviews (n = 35) at baseline were conducted with various stakeholders, including port medical services, port authorities and other stakeholders. The parameters to be analysed included specific activities and interfaces during infectious incidents, experience with past infection incidents, training and exercise, and the need for action. Furthermore, a document analysis was conducted, during which the existing contingency plans and standard operating procedures were reviewed. Results In essence, the initial challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic have led to the establishment of well-defined procedures and interfaces between the various stakeholders involved. There is a necessity for enhanced interpersonal communication between the various stakeholders and the implementation of sustainable training practices. Furthermore, greater transparency and standardisation of regulations in international health emergencies is desired. Conclusions Given the infrequency of cross-border infection incidents on board ships, targeted preparation within stakeholders is often given a lower priority than other work priorities. The participatory study design is intended to develop comprehensive concepts in collaboration with the IHR ports in the ongoing project. Subsequently, these concepts will be tested in tabletop exercises and incorporated into training formats for public health actors. Key messages • The qualitative interview study at baseline revealed a substantial need for sustained communication and training practices among stakeholders for infectious disease preparedness in German IHR ports. • The document analysis revealed relevant differences in the extent and scope of contingency plans of German ports designated under the International Health Regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1935
Primary Topic
Travel-related health issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing port preparedness in Germany in the event of infectious diseases – a best practice study

Franz‐Josef Neumann, Martin Dirksen-Fischer, Michael Fresé, Menno Boldt et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Travel-related health issues
article

Enhancing port preparedness in Germany in the event of infectious diseases – a best practice study

Franz‐Josef Neumann, Martin Dirksen-Fischer, Michael Fresé, Menno Boldt, Volker Harth, Lars Holger Ehlers, J Bäßler, Sérigne Maguèye Gueye, Jan Heidrich
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The maritime sector is exposed to specific risks in the area of communicable diseases. In Germany, five ports are designated to enforce the International Health Regulations (IHR) and must have certain core capacities to respond immediately to cross-border health threats. A joint external evaluation conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO) revealed a need to reinforce central structures in Germany. The overarching objective of the study is to harmonize and consolidate the requisite capacities for maritime health security. Methods Qualitative interviews (n = 35) at baseline were conducted with various stakeholders, including port medical services, port authorities and other stakeholders. The parameters to be analysed included specific activities and interfaces during infectious incidents, experience with past infection incidents, training and exercise, and the need for action. Furthermore, a document analysis was conducted, during which the existing contingency plans and standard operating procedures were reviewed. Results In essence, the initial challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic have led to the establishment of well-defined procedures and interfaces between the various stakeholders involved. There is a necessity for enhanced interpersonal communication between the various stakeholders and the implementation of sustainable training practices. Furthermore, greater transparency and standardisation of regulations in international health emergencies is desired. Conclusions Given the infrequency of cross-border infection incidents on board ships, targeted preparation within stakeholders is often given a lower priority than other work priorities. The participatory study design is intended to develop comprehensive concepts in collaboration with the IHR ports in the ongoing project. Subsequently, these concepts will be tested in tabletop exercises and incorporated into training formats for public health actors. Key messages • The qualitative interview study at baseline revealed a substantial need for sustained communication and training practices among stakeholders for infectious disease preparedness in German IHR ports. • The document analysis revealed relevant differences in the extent and scope of contingency plans of German ports designated under the International Health Regulations.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Travel-related health issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.