Who took care of patients with diabetes during the COVID-19-pandemic? A registry-based study

Abstract Background The rise of people with chronic diseases strains our healthcare system. Chronic disease management programs (CDMP) provide accessible care for patients with a chronic disease, aiming to prevent further development of the disease and avoid the need for (more costly and severe) hospital treatments. During the COVID-19 pandemic, CDMP provided at general practices (GP) for diabetic patients were downscaled. It remains unknown whether this downsizing led to increased care in other healthcare settings. We examined the changes in healthcare utilization by Dutch diabetic patients in 2020 and 2021 compared to 2019 regarding; 1) CDMP consultations, 2) hospital care for diabetes and 3) regular GP care. Methods In this retrospective observational study, data from electronic health records of GPs, participating in Nivel Primary Care Database, of 15,247 Dutch diabetic patients who were enrolled in CDMP, were linked to hospital claims data. Differences in healthcare utilization in 2020 and 2021 compared to 2019 were assessed quarterly using regression analyses. Results Results show that CDMP care was notably lower in 2020 and 2021, compared to 2019 (-35%). From Q1 2021 onwards, patients received more hospital care for diabetes (+13%) and regular GP care increased from Q3 2020 onwards (+14%). Compared to 2019, reduced CDMP contacts in 2020 were significantly associated (p = 0.001) with increased regular GP care in 2021. In the short-term, decreased CDMP in the first half of 2021 was significantly associated with increased regular GP care (p = 0.033) and hospital care (p = 0.037) in the second half of 2021. Conclusions Temporarily downscaling CDMP care during the COVID-19-pandemic was associated with increased hospital and regular GP care for diabetic patients. These findings contribute to making informed decisions regarding measures during future pandemics. Key messages • Chronic disease management programs at GPs appear to be effective in preventing disease exacerbations, and may help prevent (expensive) utilization of hospital care. • This research prompts further investigation into the desirability of CDMPs among patients, GPs, hospitals and policymakers, crucial for assessing undesirable healthcare shifts in diabetic patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1615
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who took care of patients with diabetes during the COVID-19-pandemic? A registry-based study

Isabelle Bos, Lotte Ramerman, Jean Muris, Lilian L. Peters et al.
European Journal of Public Health
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
article

Who took care of patients with diabetes during the COVID-19-pandemic? A registry-based study

Isabelle Bos, Lotte Ramerman, Jean Muris, Lilian L. Peters, Robert Verheij, C Rijpkema, Maarten Homburg, Tim olde Hartman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The rise of people with chronic diseases strains our healthcare system. Chronic disease management programs (CDMP) provide accessible care for patients with a chronic disease, aiming to prevent further development of the disease and avoid the need for (more costly and severe) hospital treatments. During the COVID-19 pandemic, CDMP provided at general practices (GP) for diabetic patients were downscaled. It remains unknown whether this downsizing led to increased care in other healthcare settings. We examined the changes in healthcare utilization by Dutch diabetic patients in 2020 and 2021 compared to 2019 regarding; 1) CDMP consultations, 2) hospital care for diabetes and 3) regular GP care. Methods In this retrospective observational study, data from electronic health records of GPs, participating in Nivel Primary Care Database, of 15,247 Dutch diabetic patients who were enrolled in CDMP, were linked to hospital claims data. Differences in healthcare utilization in 2020 and 2021 compared to 2019 were assessed quarterly using regression analyses. Results Results show that CDMP care was notably lower in 2020 and 2021, compared to 2019 (-35%). From Q1 2021 onwards, patients received more hospital care for diabetes (+13%) and regular GP care increased from Q3 2020 onwards (+14%). Compared to 2019, reduced CDMP contacts in 2020 were significantly associated (p = 0.001) with increased regular GP care in 2021. In the short-term, decreased CDMP in the first half of 2021 was significantly associated with increased regular GP care (p = 0.033) and hospital care (p = 0.037) in the second half of 2021. Conclusions Temporarily downscaling CDMP care during the COVID-19-pandemic was associated with increased hospital and regular GP care for diabetic patients. These findings contribute to making informed decisions regarding measures during future pandemics. Key messages • Chronic disease management programs at GPs appear to be effective in preventing disease exacerbations, and may help prevent (expensive) utilization of hospital care. • This research prompts further investigation into the desirability of CDMPs among patients, GPs, hospitals and policymakers, crucial for assessing undesirable healthcare shifts in diabetic patients.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Tilburg University (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL), Zorginstituut Nederland (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.