Effectiveness of a policy to reduce non-urgent night-time consultations in out-of-hours services

Abstract Background The utilization of Out-of-Hours General Practice (OOH-GP) services in the Netherlands has been increasing steadily. This has placed significant pressure on triagists and GPs to provide accessible and high-quality care, particularly because of patients with low-urgency health problems, who can wait to visit their GP during regular working hours. To alleviate the strain on OOH services during the night, the “spoed=spoed” policy has been implemented. This policy stipulates that only patients with urgent health problems can consult with a GP during the night (11 p.m. to 8 a.m.). However, it remains unclear whether this policy has effectively reduced consultations during the night. Methods For this study, we used pseudonymised data from electronic health records of 2/3 of Dutch OOH services (catchment area of 12.3 million), from Nivel Primary Care Database, from 2020-2023. We analysed the effects of the policy on contact rates and proportion of high-urgency health problems, by comparing OOH services that did and did not implement the policy, by comparing 6 months before and after implementation and by analysing variances across OOH services. Results Overall, there were no differences in the number or proportion of high-urgency consultations across OOH services that did and did not implement spoed=spoed. In those that did, there were no differences before and after implementation. However, certain OOH services exhibited a decrease in consultation, while also showing a higher proportion high-urgency health problems. Conclusions There is currently no definitive evidence regarding the effectiveness of “spoed=spoed”. However we should learn from the varied effects and experiences in different OOH-services, to facilitate further implementation or adaptation of the policy. Key messages • OOH services can and should learn from each other on what solutions are implemented to lower the care-burden during the night. • Policies aimed at reducing the utilization of OOH serviced should consider the conaxt from the patient, health care provider and organization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1617
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of a policy to reduce non-urgent night-time consultations in out-of-hours services

Lotte Ramerman, Robert Verheij, C Rijpkema
European Journal of Public Health
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

Effectiveness of a policy to reduce non-urgent night-time consultations in out-of-hours services

Lotte Ramerman, Robert Verheij, C Rijpkema
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The utilization of Out-of-Hours General Practice (OOH-GP) services in the Netherlands has been increasing steadily. This has placed significant pressure on triagists and GPs to provide accessible and high-quality care, particularly because of patients with low-urgency health problems, who can wait to visit their GP during regular working hours. To alleviate the strain on OOH services during the night, the “spoed=spoed” policy has been implemented. This policy stipulates that only patients with urgent health problems can consult with a GP during the night (11 p.m. to 8 a.m.). However, it remains unclear whether this policy has effectively reduced consultations during the night. Methods For this study, we used pseudonymised data from electronic health records of 2/3 of Dutch OOH services (catchment area of 12.3 million), from Nivel Primary Care Database, from 2020-2023. We analysed the effects of the policy on contact rates and proportion of high-urgency health problems, by comparing OOH services that did and did not implement the policy, by comparing 6 months before and after implementation and by analysing variances across OOH services. Results Overall, there were no differences in the number or proportion of high-urgency consultations across OOH services that did and did not implement spoed=spoed. In those that did, there were no differences before and after implementation. However, certain OOH services exhibited a decrease in consultation, while also showing a higher proportion high-urgency health problems. Conclusions There is currently no definitive evidence regarding the effectiveness of “spoed=spoed”. However we should learn from the varied effects and experiences in different OOH-services, to facilitate further implementation or adaptation of the policy. Key messages • OOH services can and should learn from each other on what solutions are implemented to lower the care-burden during the night. • Policies aimed at reducing the utilization of OOH serviced should consider the conaxt from the patient, health care provider and organization.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Tilburg University (NL), Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.