Substitution of care through the eyes of Dutch health insurers: a qualitative study

Abstract Objectives The objective of health policy measures in the Netherlands is to promote the substitution of care from hospitals to general practitioners (GPs), with reimbursement facilitating this shift. Given that health insurers are tasked with healthcare reimbursement in the Netherlands, understanding their experiences regarding care substitution is crucial. Methods First, informal interviews were held with employees from the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports, the National Health Care Institute and the Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research to construct the topic list. Then, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 employees from 7 health insurers, including healthcare purchasers, strategists, client relations executives, and business analysts, between February and April 2024. Transcripts were analyzed in MAXQDA by two researchers, after member checking. Results Insurers navigating substitution face a complex interplay of competition and collaboration, lacking a comprehensive framework. Long-term agreements with hospitals and GPs are seen as potential solutions, contingent on building trust. Diverse views on insurers’ roles emerge, from passive reimbursement to active infrastructure support. Budgetary constraints vary, with some insurers feeling constrained by national budgets for GPs and hospitals while others perceive more flexibility. Risks equalization and deductibles are identified as hindrances to substitution efforts, necessitating changes in financial incentives. Conclusions Overall, addressing these complexities requires aligning incentives and balancing collaboration and competition to optimize resource allocation to effectively meet evolving healthcare needs. A comprehensive framework to balance collaboration and competition might be helpful. Key messages • Understanding insurers’ views on care substitution is vital for healthcare policy in the Netherlands. • A comprehensive framework is needed to balance collaboration and competition, aligning incentives effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1616
Primary Topic
Health Services Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Substitution of care through the eyes of Dutch health insurers: a qualitative study

Isabelle Bos, Bert Meijboom, Robert Verheij, Jesper T. Dros et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Health Services Management and Policy
article

Substitution of care through the eyes of Dutch health insurers: a qualitative study

Isabelle Bos, Bert Meijboom, Robert Verheij, Jesper T. Dros, Christel E. van Dijk
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The objective of health policy measures in the Netherlands is to promote the substitution of care from hospitals to general practitioners (GPs), with reimbursement facilitating this shift. Given that health insurers are tasked with healthcare reimbursement in the Netherlands, understanding their experiences regarding care substitution is crucial. Methods First, informal interviews were held with employees from the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports, the National Health Care Institute and the Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research to construct the topic list. Then, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 employees from 7 health insurers, including healthcare purchasers, strategists, client relations executives, and business analysts, between February and April 2024. Transcripts were analyzed in MAXQDA by two researchers, after member checking. Results Insurers navigating substitution face a complex interplay of competition and collaboration, lacking a comprehensive framework. Long-term agreements with hospitals and GPs are seen as potential solutions, contingent on building trust. Diverse views on insurers’ roles emerge, from passive reimbursement to active infrastructure support. Budgetary constraints vary, with some insurers feeling constrained by national budgets for GPs and hospitals while others perceive more flexibility. Risks equalization and deductibles are identified as hindrances to substitution efforts, necessitating changes in financial incentives. Conclusions Overall, addressing these complexities requires aligning incentives and balancing collaboration and competition to optimize resource allocation to effectively meet evolving healthcare needs. A comprehensive framework to balance collaboration and competition might be helpful. Key messages • Understanding insurers’ views on care substitution is vital for healthcare policy in the Netherlands. • A comprehensive framework is needed to balance collaboration and competition, aligning incentives effectively.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Tilburg University (NL), National Health Care Institute (NL), Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL), Zorginstituut Nederland (NL), Nederlands Instituut Voor Zuivel Oonderzoek (NL)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Health Services Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.