How effective are eHealth literacy interventions? A meta-analysis of experimental studies

Abstract The rapid evolution of digital health emphasises the need for effective eHealth literacy (eHL) to ensure equitable access to health information and improve patient outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the effectiveness of eHL interventions, addressing the significant gap in knowledge about which strategies are most beneficial. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we systematically retrieved, quantitatively pooled and critically appraised available experimental evidence on the effectiveness of eHL interventions across different populations. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies reporting original quantitative outcomes of eHL, assessed by the eHealth Literacy Scale or other validated scales. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, with critical appraisal of the included studies. From the 504 records screened, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. They encompass interventions targeting adults with chronic diseases (6 studies), older adults (5), and young people (4) and examine either individualistic or collaborative approaches (respectively, 9 and 5 studies, and 1 assessing both). The meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in eHL, both pre- vs post-intervention (UMD 5.81, 95%CI 3.38-8.26, N = 1,025) and experimental vs control groups (OR 3.65, 95%CI 2.06-6.46, N = 1,258). Meta-regression showed a significant correlation between pre/post-intervention outcomes and baseline eHL levels (slope=-0.91, p-value=0.009). Our findings support the effectiveness of tailored interventions in significantly enhancing eHL, providing key insights (role of baseline eHL levels and intervention approach) for intervention design and implementation that are adaptable to various demographic contexts. This research was supported by the National Plan for Complementary Investments to the NRRP Hub Life Science-Digital Health (PNC-E3-2022-23683267, DHEAL-COM).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.555
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How effective are eHealth literacy interventions? A meta-analysis of experimental studies

Manila Bonciani, Matteo Lenge, Cinzia Giammarchi, Giacomo Pietro Vigezzi et al.
2 citations
European Journal of Public Health
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
1.70
article

How effective are eHealth literacy interventions? A meta-analysis of experimental studies

Manila Bonciani, Matteo Lenge, Cinzia Giammarchi, Giacomo Pietro Vigezzi, Egidio Barbi, Anna Odone, Elvira Maranesi, Cristiana Barbati, Mauro Dragoni, Tania Bailoni
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The rapid evolution of digital health emphasises the need for effective eHealth literacy (eHL) to ensure equitable access to health information and improve patient outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the effectiveness of eHL interventions, addressing the significant gap in knowledge about which strategies are most beneficial. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we systematically retrieved, quantitatively pooled and critically appraised available experimental evidence on the effectiveness of eHL interventions across different populations. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies reporting original quantitative outcomes of eHL, assessed by the eHealth Literacy Scale or other validated scales. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, with critical appraisal of the included studies. From the 504 records screened, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. They encompass interventions targeting adults with chronic diseases (6 studies), older adults (5), and young people (4) and examine either individualistic or collaborative approaches (respectively, 9 and 5 studies, and 1 assessing both). The meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in eHL, both pre- vs post-intervention (UMD 5.81, 95%CI 3.38-8.26, N = 1,025) and experimental vs control groups (OR 3.65, 95%CI 2.06-6.46, N = 1,258). Meta-regression showed a significant correlation between pre/post-intervention outcomes and baseline eHL levels (slope=-0.91, p-value=0.009). Our findings support the effectiveness of tailored interventions in significantly enhancing eHL, providing key insights (role of baseline eHL levels and intervention approach) for intervention design and implementation that are adaptable to various demographic contexts. This research was supported by the National Plan for Complementary Investments to the NRRP Hub Life Science-Digital Health (PNC-E3-2022-23683267, DHEAL-COM).

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Fondazione Bruno Kessler (IT), University of Pavia (IT), Meyer Children's Hospital (IL), Meyer Children's Hospital (IT), Institute on Aging (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.