Mapping geographic health disparities in 11 high-income nations
Abstract Health care delivery faces a myriad of challenges globally with well-documented health inequities based on geographic location. Yet, researchers and policy makers have a limited understanding of the frequency of geographic health disparities. In this survey study, we analyzed results from the 2020 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy (IHP) Survey-a nationally representative, self-reported, and cross-sectional survey of adults from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK, and the US. Eligible adults older than age 18 years were included by random sampling. Survey data were compared for the association of area type (rural or urban) with 10 health indicators across 3 domains: health status and socioeconomic risk factors, affordability of care, and access to care. Across the 11 countries and 10 health indicators and 3 domains (health status and socioeconomic risk factors, affordability of care, access to care), there were 21 occurrences of geographic health disparities. The indicators with the most occurrences of geographic health disparities were in the access to care domain. Differences in number of disparities reported by country suggest that health policy and decision makers in the US should look to Canada, Norway, and the Netherlands to improve geographic-based health equity.
Authors
- Preshit Ambade (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6919-7206)
- Jennifer L. Waller
- Neil J. MacKinnon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8111-6651)
- Vanessa Emery
- E.D. Watson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3173-6833)
- Munira Gunja
- Brittany L. Ange
Institutions
- National Health Service Scotland (GB)
- Augusta University (US)
- NHS Education for Scotland (GB)
- Augusta University Health (US)
- Commonwealth Fund (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Journal of Public Health
- Published
- 2024-10-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.015
- Primary Topic
- Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00