GIS and statistics to analyze scale change consequences on medical desert classification in France

Abstract Background Accessibility is a crucial way to overcome geographical restrictions and provides a path for alleviating the medical desert. Less attention has been paid to the choice of spatial unit in the effect of healthcare multi-accessibility. Inside the OASES European program, the France team proposes to create medical desert classification at the municipality level. The contribution of this study is to highlight the consequences of the choice of spatial scale on spatial distribution and the discrepancies between medical desert classifications. Methods Analyses were carried out in metropolitan France and overseas departments, at the commune scale and two other supra-communal scales used by public policies in France. For each spatial unit, a multidimensional and professional classification has been conducted using a three-step method: scores, principal component analysis and clustering. To demonstrate the presence of spatial dependence and to measure homogeneity between classifications joint count autocorrelation indicators and Theil’s indexes were applied. Results Our results present 7 classes of municipalities, and 5 classes of EPCI or living territories according to their level of healthcare accessibility, the dynamic of supply, and the needs of the population. Spatial representation of the classification demonstrates greater variability at the municipality level than other supra scales. Informative contrasted classes at the municipality level disappeared in favor of the middle class in all accessibility at supra scales. The results demonstrate that spatial dependence between areas at the municipality level reduced the scale effect. Conclusions Spatial approaches have become increasingly popular since they enable decision-makers to identify priority areas and allocate resources. Recognizing the instability across various scales is therefore crucial for thinking about the optimal unit of data aggregation when investigating the medical desert. Key messages • Choice of the scale is a mix between public policy decisions and data availability. • Contiguity constraint is a way to reduce the loss of information after aggregation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1586
Primary Topic
Global Health Care Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GIS and statistics to analyze scale change consequences on medical desert classification in France

Véronique Lucas-Gabrielli, Guillaume Chevillard, Cindy Padilla, Marie Bonal
European Journal of Public Health
Global Health Care Issues
article

GIS and statistics to analyze scale change consequences on medical desert classification in France

Véronique Lucas-Gabrielli, Guillaume Chevillard, Cindy Padilla, Marie Bonal
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Accessibility is a crucial way to overcome geographical restrictions and provides a path for alleviating the medical desert. Less attention has been paid to the choice of spatial unit in the effect of healthcare multi-accessibility. Inside the OASES European program, the France team proposes to create medical desert classification at the municipality level. The contribution of this study is to highlight the consequences of the choice of spatial scale on spatial distribution and the discrepancies between medical desert classifications. Methods Analyses were carried out in metropolitan France and overseas departments, at the commune scale and two other supra-communal scales used by public policies in France. For each spatial unit, a multidimensional and professional classification has been conducted using a three-step method: scores, principal component analysis and clustering. To demonstrate the presence of spatial dependence and to measure homogeneity between classifications joint count autocorrelation indicators and Theil’s indexes were applied. Results Our results present 7 classes of municipalities, and 5 classes of EPCI or living territories according to their level of healthcare accessibility, the dynamic of supply, and the needs of the population. Spatial representation of the classification demonstrates greater variability at the municipality level than other supra scales. Informative contrasted classes at the municipality level disappeared in favor of the middle class in all accessibility at supra scales. The results demonstrate that spatial dependence between areas at the municipality level reduced the scale effect. Conclusions Spatial approaches have become increasingly popular since they enable decision-makers to identify priority areas and allocate resources. Recognizing the instability across various scales is therefore crucial for thinking about the optimal unit of data aggregation when investigating the medical desert. Key messages • Choice of the scale is a mix between public policy decisions and data availability. • Contiguity constraint is a way to reduce the loss of information after aggregation.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique (FR), Institut de Recherche et de Documentation en Économie de la Santé (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Global Health Care Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.