Incidence of type 2 diabetes by occupation – 10-year follow-up of the Gutenberg Health Study

Abstract Background In order to implement targeted type 2 diabetes (T2D) prevention measures for the workplace, it is important to identify high-risk occupations. Most previous studies examine the association between T2D and occupation cross-sectionally, but longitudinal studies are missing. This study aims to investigate the 10-year incidence of T2D in the working population of a German cohort and identify occupations with an increased risk. Methods Data from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) were used to examine occupation at baseline (2007-2012) and T2D incidence at the 10-year follow-up. Occupational phases were coded into categories according to the KldB 2010. T2D was defined as either a physician-diagnosed T2D, HbA1c-level ≥6.5% or use of antidiabetic drugs. Age- and sex-standardised incidence and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for occupational groups based on the age- and sex-distribution of the German population. Standardised incidence ratios (SIR) and 95% CI were calculated using the incidence in the total GHS working population as the reference. Results Of 8130 workers at baseline, 45.2% were female, the mean age was 48.4 years and 4.5% had prevalent T2D. 388 cases occurred between baseline and the 10-year follow-up within the subgroup of persons without prevalent T2D at baseline and with follow-up data (n = 5954). The standardised incidence was 6.9%. “Food production and processing” (20.7%), “cleaners” (16.5%) and “drivers and mobile plant operators” (14.8%) had the highest standardised incidences. Compared to the total working population, we observed a threefold increased SIR for employees in “food production and processing” (3.0, 95% CI 1.8-4.7) and a two times higher SIR for “cleaners” (2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.7) and “drivers and mobile plant operators” (2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.3). Conclusions We identified occupations with an increased risk of T2D. Preventive measures and etiological research on work-related risks should focus on these occupations. Key messages • The highest standardised incidence was observed in the occupational groups “food production and processing”, “cleaners” and “drivers and mobile plant operators”. • Targeted prevention measures for type 2 diabetes in the workplace should focus on these occupational groups with increased incidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1473
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidence of type 2 diabetes by occupation – 10-year follow-up of the Gutenberg Health Study

Philipp S. Wild, Janice Hegewald, Sylvia Jankowiak, Anna Lene Seidler et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Incidence of type 2 diabetes by occupation – 10-year follow-up of the Gutenberg Health Study

Philipp S. Wild, Janice Hegewald, Sylvia Jankowiak, Anna Lene Seidler, Michaela Prigge, Julian Chalabi, Matthias Nübling, Jeanett Bauer, Merle Riechmann‐Wolf, Karin Rossnagel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In order to implement targeted type 2 diabetes (T2D) prevention measures for the workplace, it is important to identify high-risk occupations. Most previous studies examine the association between T2D and occupation cross-sectionally, but longitudinal studies are missing. This study aims to investigate the 10-year incidence of T2D in the working population of a German cohort and identify occupations with an increased risk. Methods Data from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) were used to examine occupation at baseline (2007-2012) and T2D incidence at the 10-year follow-up. Occupational phases were coded into categories according to the KldB 2010. T2D was defined as either a physician-diagnosed T2D, HbA1c-level ≥6.5% or use of antidiabetic drugs. Age- and sex-standardised incidence and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for occupational groups based on the age- and sex-distribution of the German population. Standardised incidence ratios (SIR) and 95% CI were calculated using the incidence in the total GHS working population as the reference. Results Of 8130 workers at baseline, 45.2% were female, the mean age was 48.4 years and 4.5% had prevalent T2D. 388 cases occurred between baseline and the 10-year follow-up within the subgroup of persons without prevalent T2D at baseline and with follow-up data (n = 5954). The standardised incidence was 6.9%. “Food production and processing” (20.7%), “cleaners” (16.5%) and “drivers and mobile plant operators” (14.8%) had the highest standardised incidences. Compared to the total working population, we observed a threefold increased SIR for employees in “food production and processing” (3.0, 95% CI 1.8-4.7) and a two times higher SIR for “cleaners” (2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.7) and “drivers and mobile plant operators” (2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.3). Conclusions We identified occupations with an increased risk of T2D. Preventive measures and etiological research on work-related risks should focus on these occupations. Key messages • The highest standardised incidence was observed in the occupational groups “food production and processing”, “cleaners” and “drivers and mobile plant operators”. • Targeted prevention measures for type 2 diabetes in the workplace should focus on these occupational groups with increased incidence.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
University of Freiburg (DE), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.