Machine Learning techniques for predicting inpatient probability and LOS from EU Injury Database

Abstract Background Unlike statistical inference Machine Learning (ML) makes repeatable predictions without prior assumptions about the underlying relationships among variables. The Full Data Set (FDS) of the EU-IDB (European Injury DataBase) consent to explore risk of hospitalization due to injuries using many predictors. The Length Of Stay of patients in hospital (LOS) is a relevant proxy of complexity of treatment and resources consumption. Methods The IDB-FDS provides more than 3.800.000 ED records, in years 2008-19 for 19 Countries. LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) cross-validated linearized regression technique (linear for LOS) was used for variable selection and parameter regularization. Inpatients are those admitted or transferred to hospital. Days of hospitalization were used for LOS. A cross-validated Generalized Linear Model was performed on 5 folds randomly sampled assigning 80% of records to training and 20% to testing samples. Results The strongest predictors of hospital admission risk, selected by the model were in order of importance: EUROCOST-39 diagnoses categories, Age Group, Intent, Mechanism Of Injury, Activity When Injured, Transport Injury Event, Sex Of Patient, Place Of Occurrence. EUROCOST-39 represents 61,9% of explained variability and age group 19,4%. The strongest predictors of LOS were substantially the same: EUROCOST-39 86,2% of explained variability and age group 8,6%. Conclusions The main part of variability in the ML model is explained by diagnoses reclassified according to a disability standardization method. For instance, in the maximum training sample risk of hospitalization ranges from odd 0,76% for hand/fingers sprain up to 154,02% for brain concussion. In the median sample LOS ranges from 0,45 days for strain of hand/fingers up to 11,65 for multi-trauma. A combination of more disabling injury, older age and mechanism of injury (i.e. threat to breathing) increases enormously the risk of hospitalization and LOS. Key messages • Machine Learning techniques applied on EU-IDB can provide identification of relevant risk factors of hospital admission from injuries for targeting preventive measures and organizing health care. • Artificial Intelligence consents to analyse big amount of data as dimension or analytical detail of information for identifying patterns and predictors of specific indicators for injuries or diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.341
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning techniques for predicting inpatient probability and LOS from EU Injury Database

Alessio Pitidis, Arianna Carannante, Marco Giustini, G Fondi
European Journal of Public Health
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Machine Learning techniques for predicting inpatient probability and LOS from EU Injury Database

Alessio Pitidis, Arianna Carannante, Marco Giustini, G Fondi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Unlike statistical inference Machine Learning (ML) makes repeatable predictions without prior assumptions about the underlying relationships among variables. The Full Data Set (FDS) of the EU-IDB (European Injury DataBase) consent to explore risk of hospitalization due to injuries using many predictors. The Length Of Stay of patients in hospital (LOS) is a relevant proxy of complexity of treatment and resources consumption. Methods The IDB-FDS provides more than 3.800.000 ED records, in years 2008-19 for 19 Countries. LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) cross-validated linearized regression technique (linear for LOS) was used for variable selection and parameter regularization. Inpatients are those admitted or transferred to hospital. Days of hospitalization were used for LOS. A cross-validated Generalized Linear Model was performed on 5 folds randomly sampled assigning 80% of records to training and 20% to testing samples. Results The strongest predictors of hospital admission risk, selected by the model were in order of importance: EUROCOST-39 diagnoses categories, Age Group, Intent, Mechanism Of Injury, Activity When Injured, Transport Injury Event, Sex Of Patient, Place Of Occurrence. EUROCOST-39 represents 61,9% of explained variability and age group 19,4%. The strongest predictors of LOS were substantially the same: EUROCOST-39 86,2% of explained variability and age group 8,6%. Conclusions The main part of variability in the ML model is explained by diagnoses reclassified according to a disability standardization method. For instance, in the maximum training sample risk of hospitalization ranges from odd 0,76% for hand/fingers sprain up to 154,02% for brain concussion. In the median sample LOS ranges from 0,45 days for strain of hand/fingers up to 11,65 for multi-trauma. A combination of more disabling injury, older age and mechanism of injury (i.e. threat to breathing) increases enormously the risk of hospitalization and LOS. Key messages • Machine Learning techniques applied on EU-IDB can provide identification of relevant risk factors of hospital admission from injuries for targeting preventive measures and organizing health care. • Artificial Intelligence consents to analyse big amount of data as dimension or analytical detail of information for identifying patterns and predictors of specific indicators for injuries or diseases.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
National Institute of Health (AM), Business Innovation Centre (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.