Psychological Distress Changes During COVID-19: A Belgian Cohort Study On Psychosocial Factors

Abstract Longitudinal studies have identified an increase in psychological distress across the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, the trajectories of mental health outcomes exhibit variations, suggesting potential associations with psychosocial individual factors. This paper identifies the factors of this individual trajectory of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Five waves of a prospective cohort survey were conducted with a convenience sample of the general population in Belgium between March 2020 and November 2021 (n = 4,550). Psychological distress was measured using the GHQ-12. Individual covariates included socioeconomic factors (age, gender, level of education), psychological factors (loneliness, social support, and social activities), and factors related to the virus and the lockdown measures (exposure to COVID-19 and survey wave). Multilevel models were used for analysis. Women and young people experienced more pronounced fluctuations in their risk of psychological distress across study waves, experiencing both increases and decreases. We found that individual variance in psychological distress breaks down into two components, respectively 43% for psychosocial factors (time-invariant) and 57% for the survey waves (time-variant) variation. A significant share of the time-invariant difference in psychological distress over COVID-19 is associated with loneliness, social support, and social activities. Loneliness emerged as the most important interpersonal factor associated with psychological distress. The change in psychological distress was mainly associated with psychosocial factors rather than with pandemic-related dynamics (e.g. survey waves). These findings suggest that mitigation policies aiming at controlling the pandemic should focus more on addressing specific individual vulnerabilities rather than solely responding to the fluctuations within pandemic waves to decrease their detrimental impact on mental health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.390
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Distress Changes During COVID-19: A Belgian Cohort Study On Psychosocial Factors

Katharina Seeber, Vincent Lorant, Pablo Nicaise, Camille Duveau et al.
European Journal of Public Health
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Psychological Distress Changes During COVID-19: A Belgian Cohort Study On Psychosocial Factors

Katharina Seeber, Vincent Lorant, Pablo Nicaise, Camille Duveau, Pierre Smith
article en

Abstract

Abstract Longitudinal studies have identified an increase in psychological distress across the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, the trajectories of mental health outcomes exhibit variations, suggesting potential associations with psychosocial individual factors. This paper identifies the factors of this individual trajectory of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Five waves of a prospective cohort survey were conducted with a convenience sample of the general population in Belgium between March 2020 and November 2021 (n = 4,550). Psychological distress was measured using the GHQ-12. Individual covariates included socioeconomic factors (age, gender, level of education), psychological factors (loneliness, social support, and social activities), and factors related to the virus and the lockdown measures (exposure to COVID-19 and survey wave). Multilevel models were used for analysis. Women and young people experienced more pronounced fluctuations in their risk of psychological distress across study waves, experiencing both increases and decreases. We found that individual variance in psychological distress breaks down into two components, respectively 43% for psychosocial factors (time-invariant) and 57% for the survey waves (time-variant) variation. A significant share of the time-invariant difference in psychological distress over COVID-19 is associated with loneliness, social support, and social activities. Loneliness emerged as the most important interpersonal factor associated with psychological distress. The change in psychological distress was mainly associated with psychosocial factors rather than with pandemic-related dynamics (e.g. survey waves). These findings suggest that mitigation policies aiming at controlling the pandemic should focus more on addressing specific individual vulnerabilities rather than solely responding to the fluctuations within pandemic waves to decrease their detrimental impact on mental health.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Sciensano (Belgium) (BE), UCLouvain (BE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.