Refugee mental health - systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Mental health conditions of forcibly displaced persons are unknown as the characteristics of the population change over the years. This study aims to estimate the prevalence rates of mental health conditions among refugees (depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress). Methods We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate), PsycINFO (EBSCO), Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest), and PTSDPubs (ProQuest) published between 1994-2022. We set up clear eligibility criteria and developed a data extraction sheet. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics. Results The search yielded 4,381 records, of which 171 were included in the full-text review. 54 studies were included in the final review. These 54 studies comprised of 62,522 forcibly displaced populations (49.22% males, 50.78% females). Pooled prevalence rates for anxiety, depression, and PTSD were 36.3% (95% CI 30.0-43.2), 35.9% (95% CI 31.9-41.3), and 35.4% (95% CI 29.0-42.4) respectively. Conclusions The prevalence of PTSD, depression and anxiety is significant among forcibly displaced persons. Screening for mental health conditions among these populations might prove beneficial to prevent more severe mental health conditions through the implementation of early intervention strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.804
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refugee mental health - systematic review and meta-analysis

Jutta Lindert, P Chatarajupalli
European Journal of Public Health
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

Refugee mental health - systematic review and meta-analysis

Jutta Lindert, P Chatarajupalli
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Mental health conditions of forcibly displaced persons are unknown as the characteristics of the population change over the years. This study aims to estimate the prevalence rates of mental health conditions among refugees (depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress). Methods We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate), PsycINFO (EBSCO), Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest), and PTSDPubs (ProQuest) published between 1994-2022. We set up clear eligibility criteria and developed a data extraction sheet. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics. Results The search yielded 4,381 records, of which 171 were included in the full-text review. 54 studies were included in the final review. These 54 studies comprised of 62,522 forcibly displaced populations (49.22% males, 50.78% females). Pooled prevalence rates for anxiety, depression, and PTSD were 36.3% (95% CI 30.0-43.2), 35.9% (95% CI 31.9-41.3), and 35.4% (95% CI 29.0-42.4) respectively. Conclusions The prevalence of PTSD, depression and anxiety is significant among forcibly displaced persons. Screening for mental health conditions among these populations might prove beneficial to prevent more severe mental health conditions through the implementation of early intervention strategies.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
University of Applied Sciences Emden Leer (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.