Determinants in disaster preparedness of nurses in the Azores

Abstract Background Disasters are situations of complexity and unpredictability, increasingly frequent and more destructive. They require rapid and effective action from different teams from different contexts, with preparation and qualifications for an adequate response to victims, recovering the environment, and restoring living conditions, and nurses play a significant role in these events. Understanding the level of preparedness of nurses for disasters is fundamental for defining the competency framework in the disaster management cycle. Objectives To analyze the preparation of nurses in the Azores for a catastrophe. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed with 160 nurses from the Azores. The questionnaire validated for the Portuguese population “Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool (DPET ®): Preparation of nurses in the face of a catastrophe” was applied. It was approved by the Ethics Committee. Results More than half of respondents (n = 137, 71%) indicated that they were not fully prepared to respond to disasters, while 29% (n = 46) acknowledged that they felt adequately prepared. Of the 160 respondents, only 20% (n = 30) participated in the development of emergency plans and only 14% (n = 22) participated in the creation of emergency plans that contribute to improvements at the local level. Training through simulation training was cited as important in disaster preparedness (n = 129, 78%). Discussion The present study identified little involvement of RAA nurses in preparing emergency plans and less than half feel poorly prepared in responding to a catastrophe. This finding is consistent with studies by Baker, Alamri, & Aboshaiqah (2019) and Emaliyawati et al. (2021). Conclusions This study was conducted in a region prone to natural disasters. It is vital to invest in the training of these professionals throughout the disaster cycle so that they can contribute to reducing the impact that the catastrophe will have on the individual/family and community. Key messages • Strengthening capabilities through regular disaster training based on effective information. • Low participation in the development of emergency plans that contribute to improvements at the local level.