Attitudes, fears and experiences of medical scientists towards using AI tools in their work routine

Abstract Background Artificial intelligence (AI) has experienced an explosive growth in the healthcare sector and the scientific field. Large Language Models (LLMs) are investigated as potential tool to be used in medical treatment, by e.g. producing doctor’s reports, supporting personalized medicine or educating patients. However, limitations are broadly discussed addressing patient safety and ethical concerns due to false and misleading content. Therefore, LLMs face criticism among users not only towards their integration in the patient-provider-interaction, but also in its use in medical research and health care education. In the ongoing EXPOLS (Exploring the Potential of LLMs in Statistical Consulting) study, we address the question ‘What are the attitudes, fears and experiences regarding the integration of AI tools in the clinical/scientific work routine?’ Methods We implemented an online survey that will be accessible in 07/2024. All employees at the University and Medical Center Freiburg will be asked to participate in the survey via online media. We expect a sample size of n = 600-1,200. The survey combines published measurements (e.g. TRI 2.0, result expectation measure), as well as a self-designed instrument with 15 items aiming to measure fears and attitudes towards AI. Latter was developed within a multidisciplinary team making use of ChatGPT as item generator. We will investigate its psychometric properties using exploratory factor analysis and describe distribution characteristics. Results At the time of the conference, the project will be completed and both psychometric insights and content-related results will be reported. The results could have important public health implications, since attitudes towards AI will steer its integration in the medical and clinical routine. Conclusions The EXPOLS study makes a current inventory among medical scientists in Freiburg following a modern approach in instrument development by including ChatGPT as collegial advisor. Key messages • This study explores attitudes, fears and experiences towards the integration of AI tools in the work routine from medical and scientific staff at the University of Freiburg. • The findings might be crucial in determining the integration of AI based tools in the medical and clinical work routine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1169
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attitudes, fears and experiences of medical scientists towards using AI tools in their work routine

Jörg Sahlmann, Harald Binder, Jochen Knaus, Dominikus Stelzer et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Public Health
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.12
article

Attitudes, fears and experiences of medical scientists towards using AI tools in their work routine

Jörg Sahlmann, Harald Binder, Jochen Knaus, Dominikus Stelzer, Urs Alexander Fichtner, Erika Graf, Susanne Weber, Martin Wolkewitz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Artificial intelligence (AI) has experienced an explosive growth in the healthcare sector and the scientific field. Large Language Models (LLMs) are investigated as potential tool to be used in medical treatment, by e.g. producing doctor’s reports, supporting personalized medicine or educating patients. However, limitations are broadly discussed addressing patient safety and ethical concerns due to false and misleading content. Therefore, LLMs face criticism among users not only towards their integration in the patient-provider-interaction, but also in its use in medical research and health care education. In the ongoing EXPOLS (Exploring the Potential of LLMs in Statistical Consulting) study, we address the question ‘What are the attitudes, fears and experiences regarding the integration of AI tools in the clinical/scientific work routine?’ Methods We implemented an online survey that will be accessible in 07/2024. All employees at the University and Medical Center Freiburg will be asked to participate in the survey via online media. We expect a sample size of n = 600-1,200. The survey combines published measurements (e.g. TRI 2.0, result expectation measure), as well as a self-designed instrument with 15 items aiming to measure fears and attitudes towards AI. Latter was developed within a multidisciplinary team making use of ChatGPT as item generator. We will investigate its psychometric properties using exploratory factor analysis and describe distribution characteristics. Results At the time of the conference, the project will be completed and both psychometric insights and content-related results will be reported. The results could have important public health implications, since attitudes towards AI will steer its integration in the medical and clinical routine. Conclusions The EXPOLS study makes a current inventory among medical scientists in Freiburg following a modern approach in instrument development by including ChatGPT as collegial advisor. Key messages • This study explores attitudes, fears and experiences towards the integration of AI tools in the work routine from medical and scientific staff at the University of Freiburg. • The findings might be crucial in determining the integration of AI based tools in the medical and clinical work routine.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
University of Freiburg (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.