Eco-friendly treatment: a win-win for patients, health systems, and the planet. Rapid scoping review

Abstract Background As the fifth-largest CO2 emitter globally, the healthcare industry must act to mitigate its environmental impact. This includes de-implementing low-value care and adopting eco-friendly innovative treatment alternatives. Our study aims to explore existing research on the environmental effects of these actions and the outcome measures utilized. Methods We conducted a rapid scoping review following a pre-published protocol, searching Ovid MEDLINE® and Scopus (Elsevier) from January 2015 to June 19, 2023. Initially, dual abstract and full-text screening was performed, followed by a single review. Data extraction was cross-checked by a second reviewer. Findings were narratively described using summary statistics. Results We analyzed 182 articles, primarily life cycle assessments and modeling studies (92 out of 182), with only one study being a randomized controlled trial. The research covered various healthcare practices, including consultation methods/telemedicine (32%), surgical and medical device usage (26%), medication (25%), surgical procedures (19%), as well as diagnostic tests, screening, and imaging (13%). The main sustainability strategies mentioned were ‘Rethink’ (99%) and ‘Reduce’ (81%), with ‘Reuse’ (32%), ‘Recycle’ (19%), and ‘Refuse’ (10%) being less utilized. Environmental outcomes reported included global warming (88%), resource consumption (27%), and chemical hazards (23%). Most studies were conducted in Europe (48%), followed by the USA (37%), with 75% published after 2020. Conclusions The environmental impact of healthcare is a pivotal area for public health action and fortunately, it is also emerging as a significant research field. Utilizing methodological approaches less common in evidence-based healthcare research underscores the necessity for innovative interdisciplinary collaboration and capacity building. The most pressing research gap lies in the impact of de-implementation strategies (“refuse”) targeting low-value care practices. Key messages • Measuring the environmental impact of healthcare demands the development of novel cross-disciplinary research methods and collaborations. • De-implementing low-value care represents a future win-win scenario for patients, the financial viability of healthcare systems, and global environmental sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1385
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eco-friendly treatment: a win-win for patients, health systems, and the planet. Rapid scoping review

Ana Toromanova, Christina Kien, Julia Harlfinger, Isolde Sommer et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Eco-friendly treatment: a win-win for patients, health systems, and the planet. Rapid scoping review

Ana Toromanova, Christina Kien, Julia Harlfinger, Isolde Sommer, Irma Klerings, Julia Daxenbichler, B Piso, L Grandt
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background As the fifth-largest CO2 emitter globally, the healthcare industry must act to mitigate its environmental impact. This includes de-implementing low-value care and adopting eco-friendly innovative treatment alternatives. Our study aims to explore existing research on the environmental effects of these actions and the outcome measures utilized. Methods We conducted a rapid scoping review following a pre-published protocol, searching Ovid MEDLINE® and Scopus (Elsevier) from January 2015 to June 19, 2023. Initially, dual abstract and full-text screening was performed, followed by a single review. Data extraction was cross-checked by a second reviewer. Findings were narratively described using summary statistics. Results We analyzed 182 articles, primarily life cycle assessments and modeling studies (92 out of 182), with only one study being a randomized controlled trial. The research covered various healthcare practices, including consultation methods/telemedicine (32%), surgical and medical device usage (26%), medication (25%), surgical procedures (19%), as well as diagnostic tests, screening, and imaging (13%). The main sustainability strategies mentioned were ‘Rethink’ (99%) and ‘Reduce’ (81%), with ‘Reuse’ (32%), ‘Recycle’ (19%), and ‘Refuse’ (10%) being less utilized. Environmental outcomes reported included global warming (88%), resource consumption (27%), and chemical hazards (23%). Most studies were conducted in Europe (48%), followed by the USA (37%), with 75% published after 2020. Conclusions The environmental impact of healthcare is a pivotal area for public health action and fortunately, it is also emerging as a significant research field. Utilizing methodological approaches less common in evidence-based healthcare research underscores the necessity for innovative interdisciplinary collaboration and capacity building. The most pressing research gap lies in the impact of de-implementation strategies (“refuse”) targeting low-value care practices. Key messages • Measuring the environmental impact of healthcare demands the development of novel cross-disciplinary research methods and collaborations. • De-implementing low-value care represents a future win-win scenario for patients, the financial viability of healthcare systems, and global environmental sustainability.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.