Interrogating whiteness in International Relations: Critical Examinations of Race and Racialised Power

Abstract The dynamics of knowledge production in the discipline of international relations (IR) frequently reproduce problematic and outdated idea(l)s about what counts as ‘proper’ scholarship, with positivist research setting the standard for legitimacy. This essay challenges the racialised hierarchies that reproduce unreflective endorsement of these (white, Western) ‘standards’ of knowledge production. Our review begins with an elaboration of epistemic whiteness as the foundation for a critical examination of race and racialised power in the discipline. We provide a timely and necessary review of the dynamics of racialised power in IR to expand the parameters of debates about race, racism, and coloniality. We introduce the concepts of Indigeneity and intersectionality as tools we can use to destabilise whiteness in the discipline. We conclude our discussion by showing how these two concepts can enable potentially transformative re-imaginings of IR, as we hope to foster new and plural ways of thinking world politics otherwise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Politics
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-024-00632-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Race, History, and American Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interrogating whiteness in International Relations: Critical Examinations of Race and Racialised Power

Keshab Giri, James M. Blackwell, Charlotte Carney, Kate Scott et al.
1 citations
International Politics
Race, History, and American Society
1.13
article

Interrogating whiteness in International Relations: Critical Examinations of Race and Racialised Power

Keshab Giri, James M. Blackwell, Charlotte Carney, Kate Scott, Digvijay V. Nair, Laura J. Shepherd
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The dynamics of knowledge production in the discipline of international relations (IR) frequently reproduce problematic and outdated idea(l)s about what counts as ‘proper’ scholarship, with positivist research setting the standard for legitimacy. This essay challenges the racialised hierarchies that reproduce unreflective endorsement of these (white, Western) ‘standards’ of knowledge production. Our review begins with an elaboration of epistemic whiteness as the foundation for a critical examination of race and racialised power in the discipline. We provide a timely and necessary review of the dynamics of racialised power in IR to expand the parameters of debates about race, racism, and coloniality. We introduce the concepts of Indigeneity and intersectionality as tools we can use to destabilise whiteness in the discipline. We conclude our discussion by showing how these two concepts can enable potentially transformative re-imaginings of IR, as we hope to foster new and plural ways of thinking world politics otherwise.

International Politics
Australian National University (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), University of St Andrews (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Government of New South Wales (AU)
University of Sydney
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Race, History, and American Society
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.