Atrial function after cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Abstract Background After cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), restitution of normal left atrial (LA) function is said to need several days to recover. However, in previous studies, the evaluation of LA function was only used transesophageal or transthoracic echocardiography. During catheter ablation (CA) for AF, pulmonary venous (PV) blood flow can be measured accurately using an intracardiac echocardiogram (ICE). The atrial systolic PV regurgitation (PVa) wave measured by ICE is a good indicator of LA contractility because it reflects the active contraction of the LA. Purpose This study aims to investigate the LA function in the hyperacute phase and the factors which affect after cardioversion. Methods 40 AF patients (18 paroxysmal AF, 22 persistent AF) who underwent CA were enrolled. PVa wave was measured twice before RFCA and after the procedure using intracardiac ultrasound. Voltage map of the LV was obtained using the CARTO system at the end of the session, and the percentage of low voltage area which was determined area as less than 0.1mV in the mapped LA surface area (LVA%) was calculated. Results Preoperative PVa was 1.61 ± 0.09 m/sec in the paroxysmal AF group (PaAF), and no PVa was observed in the persistent AF group (PeAF). Postoperative PVa were comparable between PaAF (0.18±0.06 m/sec) and PeAF (0.18±0.07 m/sec). Then, the PeAF were divided into 2 groups based on LVA% in the anterior area, posterior area, and total LA area (cutoff 1,5 and 10%, respectively). In the anterior lower LVA% group, PVa were significantly increased (0.20 ± 0.07 m/sec) after defibrillation compared with the anterior higher LVA% group (0.14 ± 0.06 m/sec; P=0.02), whilst no difference was observed when it was divided in the posterior wall or overall. Conclusion Even in PeAF, LA function improves to the same degree as in the PaAF immediately after cardioversion, and the posterior wall LVA, including posterior wall isolation, may not affect LA function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.518
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Atrial function after cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Toru Takii, Shigeto Namiuchi, Kazuki Noda, Shinichiro Sunamura et al.
European Heart Journal
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Atrial function after cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Toru Takii, Shigeto Namiuchi, Kazuki Noda, Shinichiro Sunamura, Atsushi Tanita, Tsuyoshi Ogata, Ken Onodera
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background After cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), restitution of normal left atrial (LA) function is said to need several days to recover. However, in previous studies, the evaluation of LA function was only used transesophageal or transthoracic echocardiography. During catheter ablation (CA) for AF, pulmonary venous (PV) blood flow can be measured accurately using an intracardiac echocardiogram (ICE). The atrial systolic PV regurgitation (PVa) wave measured by ICE is a good indicator of LA contractility because it reflects the active contraction of the LA. Purpose This study aims to investigate the LA function in the hyperacute phase and the factors which affect after cardioversion. Methods 40 AF patients (18 paroxysmal AF, 22 persistent AF) who underwent CA were enrolled. PVa wave was measured twice before RFCA and after the procedure using intracardiac ultrasound. Voltage map of the LV was obtained using the CARTO system at the end of the session, and the percentage of low voltage area which was determined area as less than 0.1mV in the mapped LA surface area (LVA%) was calculated. Results Preoperative PVa was 1.61 ± 0.09 m/sec in the paroxysmal AF group (PaAF), and no PVa was observed in the persistent AF group (PeAF). Postoperative PVa were comparable between PaAF (0.18±0.06 m/sec) and PeAF (0.18±0.07 m/sec). Then, the PeAF were divided into 2 groups based on LVA% in the anterior area, posterior area, and total LA area (cutoff 1,5 and 10%, respectively). In the anterior lower LVA% group, PVa were significantly increased (0.20 ± 0.07 m/sec) after defibrillation compared with the anterior higher LVA% group (0.14 ± 0.06 m/sec; P=0.02), whilst no difference was observed when it was divided in the posterior wall or overall. Conclusion Even in PeAF, LA function improves to the same degree as in the PaAF immediately after cardioversion, and the posterior wall LVA, including posterior wall isolation, may not affect LA function.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Sendai Medical Center (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.