Using Stay Interviews as a Quality Improvement Tool for Healthcare Workforce Retention

Background and Objectives: The novel coronavirus of 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic exacerbated already persistent health care workforce issues—eg, overwhelming workloads, chronic understaffing, and burnout—associated with turnover intent and actual turnover. While turnover may be inevitable, strategies that help organizations anticipate and mitigate its impact require knowledge about how employees are experiencing their work (not just performing) on an ongoing basis. Unlike performance appraisals, “stay interviewsing” is a proactive management approach to assess the organizational and personal factors that influence current employees’ retention in their roles (ie, why they stay). We describe our process of developing and using a stay interview guide with current Women’s Health Patient-Aligned Care Teams (WH-PACT) employees and comment on the feasibility of conducting these interviews, their acceptability by participating employees, and their potential application to inform retention strategies in learning health systems (LHS) like the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Methods: We conducted 24 stay interviews with current WH-PACT employees, including women’s health primary care providers (WH-PCPs, n = 7), registered nurses (RNs, n = 6), licensed practical nurses (LPNs, n = 6), and medical support assistants (MSAs, n = 5) with established tenure (greater than 3 years for MSAs and LPNs, and greater than 5 years for RNs and WH-PCPs) at VA medical centers and community-based outpatient clinics. Using rapid qualitative analysis, we summarized interview transcripts for preliminary insights that describe the utility of stay interviews to collect feedback on clinician and non-clinician employees’ experiences of work in VA women’s health primary care. Results: The responses and feedback from our participants indicate that stay interviews are potentially feasible for LHSs to use as a retention tool and are acceptable to employees for sharing their perspectives. Conclusion: We discuss who should conduct stay interviews and the potential ethical implications organizations must consider before conducting them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality Management in Health Care
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/qmh.0000000000000465
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Stay Interviews as a Quality Improvement Tool for Healthcare Workforce Retention

Ismelda Canelo, Kristina Oishi, Alison Brown, Tanya T. Olmos‐Ochoa et al.
1 citations
Quality Management in Health Care
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
0.85
article

Using Stay Interviews as a Quality Improvement Tool for Healthcare Workforce Retention

Ismelda Canelo, Kristina Oishi, Alison Brown, Tanya T. Olmos‐Ochoa, Shay Cannedy, Matthew McCoy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The novel coronavirus of 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic exacerbated already persistent health care workforce issues—eg, overwhelming workloads, chronic understaffing, and burnout—associated with turnover intent and actual turnover. While turnover may be inevitable, strategies that help organizations anticipate and mitigate its impact require knowledge about how employees are experiencing their work (not just performing) on an ongoing basis. Unlike performance appraisals, “stay interviewsing” is a proactive management approach to assess the organizational and personal factors that influence current employees’ retention in their roles (ie, why they stay). We describe our process of developing and using a stay interview guide with current Women’s Health Patient-Aligned Care Teams (WH-PACT) employees and comment on the feasibility of conducting these interviews, their acceptability by participating employees, and their potential application to inform retention strategies in learning health systems (LHS) like the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Methods: We conducted 24 stay interviews with current WH-PACT employees, including women’s health primary care providers (WH-PCPs, n = 7), registered nurses (RNs, n = 6), licensed practical nurses (LPNs, n = 6), and medical support assistants (MSAs, n = 5) with established tenure (greater than 3 years for MSAs and LPNs, and greater than 5 years for RNs and WH-PCPs) at VA medical centers and community-based outpatient clinics. Using rapid qualitative analysis, we summarized interview transcripts for preliminary insights that describe the utility of stay interviews to collect feedback on clinician and non-clinician employees’ experiences of work in VA women’s health primary care. Results: The responses and feedback from our participants indicate that stay interviews are potentially feasible for LHSs to use as a retention tool and are acceptable to employees for sharing their perspectives. Conclusion: We discuss who should conduct stay interviews and the potential ethical implications organizations must consider before conducting them.

Quality Management in Health CareVol. 35(1)
Stoas University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.