The use of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy to screen for asymptomatic coronary artery disease prior to kidney transplantation

Abstract Background and Objectives Advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), including significant asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) [1], compared to the general general public. Additionally, CVD is the leading cause of mortality in kidney transplant recipients [2]. Given the relative scarcity of available organs, individuals are commonly screened for CAD with non-invasive cardiac testing such as Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy (MPS). However, the benefits of screening for asymptomatic CAD are unproven and in the absence of an established screening protocol, investigations vary centre to centre and can result in uncertain interpretation of results and unnecessary delays in transplantation. The objective of this study was to assess the benefits of asymptomatic CVD screening of potential kidney transplant recipients, and its impact on transplantation outcomes. Methods This retrospective analysis included all MPS requested by the transplant team during patients’ assessment process between 2015 and 2023. Any resultant coronary angiograms (CA) were reviewed for evidence of significant CAD. Transplant decisions were reviewed to assess the impact of CVD screening on individuals’ transplant status. Results 689 individuals underwent MPS. Of these, 90% required no further cardiovascular investigations. 6% (42 individuals) had subsequent CA. <1% (5) required percutaneous intervention (PCI) whilst the rest (37) were deemed to have no significant CAD. A further 4% (29) required coronary angiography at a later date (>2 years after their MPS), with similar rates of PCI (1%). All three outcome groups (negative MPS, CA referral, CA in the future) had similar rates of diabetes (40%) and previous diagnoses of CAD (14%). The average wait for CA was 283 days post-MPS. Transplant decisions took a further 286 days after CA, which in combination with the delays associated with CA resulted in average delays of 1.5 years. Conclusions The use of MPS to screen for significant asymptomatic CAD identifies only a small proportion of individuals requiring intervention prior to kidney transplantation and significantly delays transplant decisions. These results suggest transplant centres should review their use of CVD screening prior to listing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.3256
Primary Topic
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The use of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy to screen for asymptomatic coronary artery disease prior to kidney transplantation

Arif Khwaja, O Dirir
European Heart Journal
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
article

The use of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy to screen for asymptomatic coronary artery disease prior to kidney transplantation

Arif Khwaja, O Dirir
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives Advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), including significant asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) [1], compared to the general general public. Additionally, CVD is the leading cause of mortality in kidney transplant recipients [2]. Given the relative scarcity of available organs, individuals are commonly screened for CAD with non-invasive cardiac testing such as Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy (MPS). However, the benefits of screening for asymptomatic CAD are unproven and in the absence of an established screening protocol, investigations vary centre to centre and can result in uncertain interpretation of results and unnecessary delays in transplantation. The objective of this study was to assess the benefits of asymptomatic CVD screening of potential kidney transplant recipients, and its impact on transplantation outcomes. Methods This retrospective analysis included all MPS requested by the transplant team during patients’ assessment process between 2015 and 2023. Any resultant coronary angiograms (CA) were reviewed for evidence of significant CAD. Transplant decisions were reviewed to assess the impact of CVD screening on individuals’ transplant status. Results 689 individuals underwent MPS. Of these, 90% required no further cardiovascular investigations. 6% (42 individuals) had subsequent CA. <1% (5) required percutaneous intervention (PCI) whilst the rest (37) were deemed to have no significant CAD. A further 4% (29) required coronary angiography at a later date (>2 years after their MPS), with similar rates of PCI (1%). All three outcome groups (negative MPS, CA referral, CA in the future) had similar rates of diabetes (40%) and previous diagnoses of CAD (14%). The average wait for CA was 283 days post-MPS. Transplant decisions took a further 286 days after CA, which in combination with the delays associated with CA resulted in average delays of 1.5 years. Conclusions The use of MPS to screen for significant asymptomatic CAD identifies only a small proportion of individuals requiring intervention prior to kidney transplantation and significantly delays transplant decisions. These results suggest transplant centres should review their use of CVD screening prior to listing.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.