Personalized prediction model specific for sudden cardiac death in the population: a machine learning study based on EHR

Abstract Background Predicting sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the general population remains a significant challenge, particularly at the individual level. SCD and myocardial infarction (MI) share similar pattern of characteristics and risk factors, making their specific prediction highly difficult. As a result, the current prediction models exhibit low specificity. Methods To estimate the specific risk of SCD over three months, we trained a machine learning model on electronic health record (EHR) data representing 8,566,229 drug prescriptions and 801,352 of hospital diagnoses up to five years prior to SCD. The data were obtained from a French cohort of 12,338 SCD and from a cohort of 12,338 controls from 2011 to 2015. We then validated the results on two external cohorts: one temporal cohort in the same area between 2016 and 2020 with 11,620 SCD cases and 11,620 controls and one geographical cohort from the USA with 892 SCD cases and 892 controls from 2013 to 2021. In order to address the specificity of our prediction model for SCD, SCD cases collected between 2016 and 2020 were also matched with a group of 35 000 controls who had myocardial infarction, with no SCD, following the same protocol as for the controls issued from the general population. Findings: The analysis reveals three distinct patterns of distribution for SCD cases, controls, and MI cases. We observed a semi linear increase of SCD cases over the deciles of predicted risk, and our model detected 24% (2,908) of SCD cases with a predicted risk exceeding 90% (highest decile). We observed the opposite among the controls that decreased linearly with increasing deciles of predicted risk: most of the controls were accurately identified in the lowest deciles, and there were only 214 controls (2%) in the highest decile. Interestingly, we observed a relatively stable distribution of MI cases across the deciles, with 10% of MI cases in the highest decile (Figure 1). Interpretation: We developed and validated a personalized prediction model that is able to identify subjects at high-risk for SCD specifically. Figure 1: Histogram of predicted risks for sudden cardiac death cases, controls and myocardial infarction cases in the validation cohort.Figure 1

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.3464
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personalized prediction model specific for sudden cardiac death in the population: a machine learning study based on EHR

Wulfran Bougouin, Richard Chocron, Nicolás Chopin, Thomas Laurenceau et al.
European Heart Journal
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
article

Personalized prediction model specific for sudden cardiac death in the population: a machine learning study based on EHR

Wulfran Bougouin, Richard Chocron, Nicolás Chopin, Thomas Laurenceau, Frankie Beganton, Xavier Jouven, Y Youssif, J P Empanan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Predicting sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the general population remains a significant challenge, particularly at the individual level. SCD and myocardial infarction (MI) share similar pattern of characteristics and risk factors, making their specific prediction highly difficult. As a result, the current prediction models exhibit low specificity. Methods To estimate the specific risk of SCD over three months, we trained a machine learning model on electronic health record (EHR) data representing 8,566,229 drug prescriptions and 801,352 of hospital diagnoses up to five years prior to SCD. The data were obtained from a French cohort of 12,338 SCD and from a cohort of 12,338 controls from 2011 to 2015. We then validated the results on two external cohorts: one temporal cohort in the same area between 2016 and 2020 with 11,620 SCD cases and 11,620 controls and one geographical cohort from the USA with 892 SCD cases and 892 controls from 2013 to 2021. In order to address the specificity of our prediction model for SCD, SCD cases collected between 2016 and 2020 were also matched with a group of 35 000 controls who had myocardial infarction, with no SCD, following the same protocol as for the controls issued from the general population. Findings: The analysis reveals three distinct patterns of distribution for SCD cases, controls, and MI cases. We observed a semi linear increase of SCD cases over the deciles of predicted risk, and our model detected 24% (2,908) of SCD cases with a predicted risk exceeding 90% (highest decile). We observed the opposite among the controls that decreased linearly with increasing deciles of predicted risk: most of the controls were accurately identified in the lowest deciles, and there were only 214 controls (2%) in the highest decile. Interestingly, we observed a relatively stable distribution of MI cases across the deciles, with 10% of MI cases in the highest decile (Figure 1). Interpretation: We developed and validated a personalized prediction model that is able to identify subjects at high-risk for SCD specifically. Figure 1: Histogram of predicted risks for sudden cardiac death cases, controls and myocardial infarction cases in the validation cohort.Figure 1

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (FR), ENSAE Paris (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.