Smartphone motion sensor based detection of atrial fibrillation in populations referred to cardiology

Abstract Introduction The motion sensors of a common smartphone when placed on chest can be used to detect vibrations caused by cardiac motion. The concept has been shown to detect atrial fibrillation (AFib) in clinical setting with 96% accuracy. Purpose We sought to examine how the smartphone motion sensor based AFib detection performs in various populations referred to cardiology pooled from 3 different studies addressing arrhythmias, heart failure or suspected coronary artery disease. Methods From a total of 1 524 patient recordings 748 recordings were from men (49%). The mean age of the patients was 64 years (range 20-94 years) and mean BMI was 28.9kg/m2 (range 15.2-63.7kg/m2). The signals were collected by placing a smartphone on chest of the patients in supine position and then analyzed with the CardioSignal solution. From the recordings two 60 second strips were analyzed. A simultaneous 5-lead or 1-lead ECG data was collected for reference. The ECG signals were analyzed for quality and rhythm diagnostics by 2 physicians blinded for the motion sensor AFib detection result. Finally, a head-to-head comparison was conducted for the motion sensor AFib detection result and the ECG data. Results From the 1524 patient recordings the final analysis set included 237 individuals with AFib, whereas the rest had sinus rhythm. The sensitivity to detect AFib was 91.9% and specificity 98.7%. The positive predictive value was 91.0% (88.3% to 94.2%) and the negative predictive value 98.3% (95.2% to 99.1%). The accuracy was 97.0% (94.7% to 97.7%). Conclusions A smartphone-based assessment of AFib using the embedded motion sensors seem to yield very good detection results, especially specificity. The accuracy of the results is comparable to available ECG and PPG based AFib detection solutions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.3558
Citations
1
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smartphone motion sensor based detection of atrial fibrillation in populations referred to cardiology

Kamal Jafarian Dehkordi, Tero Hurnanen, Juuso Blomster, Kristiina Santalahti et al.
1 citations
European Heart Journal
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
0.40
article

Smartphone motion sensor based detection of atrial fibrillation in populations referred to cardiology

Kamal Jafarian Dehkordi, Tero Hurnanen, Juuso Blomster, Kristiina Santalahti, FJ Taghavi, Olli Lahdenoja, Mikko Pänkäälä, Tero Tapiovaara
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The motion sensors of a common smartphone when placed on chest can be used to detect vibrations caused by cardiac motion. The concept has been shown to detect atrial fibrillation (AFib) in clinical setting with 96% accuracy. Purpose We sought to examine how the smartphone motion sensor based AFib detection performs in various populations referred to cardiology pooled from 3 different studies addressing arrhythmias, heart failure or suspected coronary artery disease. Methods From a total of 1 524 patient recordings 748 recordings were from men (49%). The mean age of the patients was 64 years (range 20-94 years) and mean BMI was 28.9kg/m2 (range 15.2-63.7kg/m2). The signals were collected by placing a smartphone on chest of the patients in supine position and then analyzed with the CardioSignal solution. From the recordings two 60 second strips were analyzed. A simultaneous 5-lead or 1-lead ECG data was collected for reference. The ECG signals were analyzed for quality and rhythm diagnostics by 2 physicians blinded for the motion sensor AFib detection result. Finally, a head-to-head comparison was conducted for the motion sensor AFib detection result and the ECG data. Results From the 1524 patient recordings the final analysis set included 237 individuals with AFib, whereas the rest had sinus rhythm. The sensitivity to detect AFib was 91.9% and specificity 98.7%. The positive predictive value was 91.0% (88.3% to 94.2%) and the negative predictive value 98.3% (95.2% to 99.1%). The accuracy was 97.0% (94.7% to 97.7%). Conclusions A smartphone-based assessment of AFib using the embedded motion sensors seem to yield very good detection results, especially specificity. The accuracy of the results is comparable to available ECG and PPG based AFib detection solutions.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.