Point-of-care screening for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction using simple pulse oximetry

Abstract Background More than 64 million patients with heart failure (HF) are burdened with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations, and high readmission rates. While HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) accounts for approximately half of these patients, there is currently no effective tool for performing cost-effective and reliable early-stage screening. For this purpose, we derived and cross-validated a machine learning (ML) based system capable of identifying HFrEF based on analysis of the photoplethysmographic (PPG) signal recorded by a simple pulse-oximeter. Methods Patients attending a routine ambulatory check-up at an outpatient clinic were included in the study. Left ventricular ejection fraction was determined by standard transthoracic echocardiography. Diagnosis of HF was based on the latest ESC recommendations for HF. PPG was measured using a standard oximeter modified to record raw PPG signal. Before processing, the quality of the measured PPG signal was assessed by signal quality indices to determine whether the quality of signal was sufficient for further analysis. In brief, the signal processing involved noise removal, filtering for specific frequencies, automatic artifact detection and identification of individual heartbeats, on which specific parts of the signal and signal characteristics, necessary for further analysis, were identified. Four different ML processing pipelines with different approaches to feature selection and class balancing were deployed, validated using the K-fold cross-validation and compared. Results A total of 371 patients were included in the study: 54 patients with HFrEF (mean age 66.87 ± 14.35, 74.07% male) and 317 patients with HFmrEF (4), HFpEF (42) or no history of HF (271) (mean age 54.12 ± 17.79, 51.73% male). From the 4 ML pipelines, LightGBM with SMOTE + Edited Nearest Neighbors balancing had the highest cross-validated predictive performance for detection of HFrEF (c-statistics 0.8, CI 0.69 – 0.89). Conclusions Our results suggest that HFrEF can be effectively screened using a simple pulse oximeter, thanks to ML signal analysis. This solution could be adapted to a simple, non-invasive, readily available, time-saving, and inexpensive point-of-care diagnostic tool for primary care. Early disease detection and referral to a cardiologist (or HF specialist) would have a positive impact on patient morbidity and mortality.Receiver Operating Characteristics CurveModel Performance Metrics

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.954
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Point-of-care screening for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction using simple pulse oximetry

Marta Kollárová, Jana Jankova, Štefan Tóth, Nikola Jajcay et al.
2 citations
European Heart Journal
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
1.15
article

Point-of-care screening for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction using simple pulse oximetry

Marta Kollárová, Jana Jankova, Štefan Tóth, Nikola Jajcay, Branislav Bezák, Viera Šebenová Jerigová, Amitai Segev, O. M. Holly, Allan Böhm, Stephan Schwarz, Laura Johanesova, Julia Lucka
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background More than 64 million patients with heart failure (HF) are burdened with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations, and high readmission rates. While HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) accounts for approximately half of these patients, there is currently no effective tool for performing cost-effective and reliable early-stage screening. For this purpose, we derived and cross-validated a machine learning (ML) based system capable of identifying HFrEF based on analysis of the photoplethysmographic (PPG) signal recorded by a simple pulse-oximeter. Methods Patients attending a routine ambulatory check-up at an outpatient clinic were included in the study. Left ventricular ejection fraction was determined by standard transthoracic echocardiography. Diagnosis of HF was based on the latest ESC recommendations for HF. PPG was measured using a standard oximeter modified to record raw PPG signal. Before processing, the quality of the measured PPG signal was assessed by signal quality indices to determine whether the quality of signal was sufficient for further analysis. In brief, the signal processing involved noise removal, filtering for specific frequencies, automatic artifact detection and identification of individual heartbeats, on which specific parts of the signal and signal characteristics, necessary for further analysis, were identified. Four different ML processing pipelines with different approaches to feature selection and class balancing were deployed, validated using the K-fold cross-validation and compared. Results A total of 371 patients were included in the study: 54 patients with HFrEF (mean age 66.87 ± 14.35, 74.07% male) and 317 patients with HFmrEF (4), HFpEF (42) or no history of HF (271) (mean age 54.12 ± 17.79, 51.73% male). From the 4 ML pipelines, LightGBM with SMOTE + Edited Nearest Neighbors balancing had the highest cross-validated predictive performance for detection of HFrEF (c-statistics 0.8, CI 0.69 – 0.89). Conclusions Our results suggest that HFrEF can be effectively screened using a simple pulse oximeter, thanks to ML signal analysis. This solution could be adapted to a simple, non-invasive, readily available, time-saving, and inexpensive point-of-care diagnostic tool for primary care. Early disease detection and referral to a cardiologist (or HF specialist) would have a positive impact on patient morbidity and mortality.Receiver Operating Characteristics CurveModel Performance Metrics

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik (SK), Sheba Medical Center (IL), Medirex Group Academy (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.