Sex differences in clinical data and long-term outcomes of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting with cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract Background Data on contemporary clinical practice and long-term outcomes for sex differences in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) is limited. Purpose This study aimed to investigate contemporary clinical data and long-term clinical outcomes according to sex differences in elderly patients undergoing PCI for acute MI complicated by CS. Methods We analyzed data from a nationwide, prospective, and real-world registry comprising elderly patients (≥65 years) with acute MI who have undergone PCI and presented with CS. Of the 540 patients included, 228 were women, and 312 were men. We compared major adverse cardiac events (MACE; all-cause death, recurrent MI, any revascularization, stroke, heart failure [HF] readmission, or definite/probable stent thrombosis [ST]) and the components of MACE between the groups using multivariable Cox regression, propensity score (PS) matching, and PS-adjusted analyses. Results Compared to men, women were younger and had higher incidences of hypertension and elevated pro-BNP levels. No significant differences were observed in other cardiovascular risk factors, left ventricular systolic function levels, or adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy between the groups. Over a median follow-up of 1035 days, MACE, all-cause death, and cardiac death occurred in 257 (47.6%), 212 (39.3%), and 170 (31.5%) patients, respectively. Women exhibited significantly increased risks of MACE (overall: 53.5% vs. 43.3%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.97, p=0.023; PS-matched: n=368, 52.3% vs. 41.8%, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-0.94, p=0.033), all-cause death (overall: 44.7% vs. 35.3%, HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.58-0.97, p=0.032; PS-matched: 42.8% vs. 33.4%, HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54-0.95, p=0.041), cardiac death (overall: 35.1% vs. 28.8%, HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60-0.97, p=0.048; PS-matched: 34.4% vs. 26.9%, HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.54-0.95, p=0.043) compared to men. There were no significant differences in the risks of recurrent MI, any revascularization, stroke, HF readmission, and definite/probable ST between the groups. Conclusions In this nationwide registry, women compared to men exhibited increased risks of long-term clinical outcomes in elderly patients with acute MI who have undergone PCI presenting with CS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.3137
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex differences in clinical data and long-term outcomes of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting with cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Jung Hyun Choi, Jeong Cheon Choe, H C Lee, S H Lee et al.
European Heart Journal
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
article

Sex differences in clinical data and long-term outcomes of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting with cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Jung Hyun Choi, Jeong Cheon Choe, H C Lee, S H Lee, Jinhee Ahn, H W Lee, Min Suk Kim, Min Ho Jeong, K S, J H Oh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Data on contemporary clinical practice and long-term outcomes for sex differences in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) is limited. Purpose This study aimed to investigate contemporary clinical data and long-term clinical outcomes according to sex differences in elderly patients undergoing PCI for acute MI complicated by CS. Methods We analyzed data from a nationwide, prospective, and real-world registry comprising elderly patients (≥65 years) with acute MI who have undergone PCI and presented with CS. Of the 540 patients included, 228 were women, and 312 were men. We compared major adverse cardiac events (MACE; all-cause death, recurrent MI, any revascularization, stroke, heart failure [HF] readmission, or definite/probable stent thrombosis [ST]) and the components of MACE between the groups using multivariable Cox regression, propensity score (PS) matching, and PS-adjusted analyses. Results Compared to men, women were younger and had higher incidences of hypertension and elevated pro-BNP levels. No significant differences were observed in other cardiovascular risk factors, left ventricular systolic function levels, or adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy between the groups. Over a median follow-up of 1035 days, MACE, all-cause death, and cardiac death occurred in 257 (47.6%), 212 (39.3%), and 170 (31.5%) patients, respectively. Women exhibited significantly increased risks of MACE (overall: 53.5% vs. 43.3%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.97, p=0.023; PS-matched: n=368, 52.3% vs. 41.8%, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-0.94, p=0.033), all-cause death (overall: 44.7% vs. 35.3%, HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.58-0.97, p=0.032; PS-matched: 42.8% vs. 33.4%, HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54-0.95, p=0.041), cardiac death (overall: 35.1% vs. 28.8%, HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60-0.97, p=0.048; PS-matched: 34.4% vs. 26.9%, HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.54-0.95, p=0.043) compared to men. There were no significant differences in the risks of recurrent MI, any revascularization, stroke, HF readmission, and definite/probable ST between the groups. Conclusions In this nationwide registry, women compared to men exhibited increased risks of long-term clinical outcomes in elderly patients with acute MI who have undergone PCI presenting with CS.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Chonnam National University Hospital (KR), Pusan National University Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.