No improvement in atrial arrhythmia rates in patients on baroreflex activation therapy

Abstract Background Atrial arrhythmias encompass a wide range of abnormal cardiac rhythms including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia. Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have increased risk of atrial arrhythmias, ultimately leading to increased morbidity. Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT) employs an implantable device to increase parasympathetic nervous system activity by stimulating the carotid baroreceptors thereby reducing afterload and heart failure symptoms. In our prior study, BAT therapy has been shown to reduce hospitalization rates in patients with HFrEF. However, the effects of BAT on atrial arrhythmia has never been studied. Objective In this study, we analyzed the effects of BAT on atrial arrhythmia rates in patients with HFrEF. Methods Patients with HFrEF with BAT therapy for at least 12-months at a hospital were retrospectively studied. Inclusion criteria includes implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement of at least 12-months pre- and post-BAT therapy. Additionally, patients diagnosed with atrial arrhythmias prior to the study timeline were excluded. Atrial arrhythmia rates 6 and 12-months pre-BAT therapy and 6 and 12-months post-BAT therapy were compared. Atrial arrhythmia episodes were recorded through ICD interrogation every 1-3 months in the clinic. Of the 31 identified patients on BAT therapy, 11 patients fit the inclusion criteria. For the 11 patients in the study, 3 identified as female and 8 identified as male, 6 identified as white, 4 identified as Hispanic, and 1 identified as African-American with a mean age of 59.8 ± 17.4 years. The average left ventricular ejection fraction pre-BAT therapy was 23.8 ± 10.8%. Results The mean average atrial arrhythmia rates for 6-month pre-BAT therapy and 6-month post-BAT therapy were 0.12/month ± 0.40 and 1.32/month ± 2.76 respectively (p=0.18), suggesting no differences in atrial arrhythmia rates at 6-months with BAT therapy. The mean average atrial arrhythmia rates for 12-month pre-BAT therapy and 12-month post-BAT therapy were 0.11/month ± 0.35 and 2.40/month ± 5.84 respectively (p=0.22), suggesting no differences in atrial arrhythmia rates at 12-months with BAT therapy. Conclusion Although BAT therapy has been shown to decrease hospitalization rates, BAT therapy is not associated with decreased atrial arrhythmia rates at 6 months and 12 months.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.832
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No improvement in atrial arrhythmia rates in patients on baroreflex activation therapy

Michael Fong, Vinh Pham, A Gan
European Heart Journal
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

No improvement in atrial arrhythmia rates in patients on baroreflex activation therapy

Michael Fong, Vinh Pham, A Gan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Atrial arrhythmias encompass a wide range of abnormal cardiac rhythms including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia. Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have increased risk of atrial arrhythmias, ultimately leading to increased morbidity. Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT) employs an implantable device to increase parasympathetic nervous system activity by stimulating the carotid baroreceptors thereby reducing afterload and heart failure symptoms. In our prior study, BAT therapy has been shown to reduce hospitalization rates in patients with HFrEF. However, the effects of BAT on atrial arrhythmia has never been studied. Objective In this study, we analyzed the effects of BAT on atrial arrhythmia rates in patients with HFrEF. Methods Patients with HFrEF with BAT therapy for at least 12-months at a hospital were retrospectively studied. Inclusion criteria includes implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement of at least 12-months pre- and post-BAT therapy. Additionally, patients diagnosed with atrial arrhythmias prior to the study timeline were excluded. Atrial arrhythmia rates 6 and 12-months pre-BAT therapy and 6 and 12-months post-BAT therapy were compared. Atrial arrhythmia episodes were recorded through ICD interrogation every 1-3 months in the clinic. Of the 31 identified patients on BAT therapy, 11 patients fit the inclusion criteria. For the 11 patients in the study, 3 identified as female and 8 identified as male, 6 identified as white, 4 identified as Hispanic, and 1 identified as African-American with a mean age of 59.8 ± 17.4 years. The average left ventricular ejection fraction pre-BAT therapy was 23.8 ± 10.8%. Results The mean average atrial arrhythmia rates for 6-month pre-BAT therapy and 6-month post-BAT therapy were 0.12/month ± 0.40 and 1.32/month ± 2.76 respectively (p=0.18), suggesting no differences in atrial arrhythmia rates at 6-months with BAT therapy. The mean average atrial arrhythmia rates for 12-month pre-BAT therapy and 12-month post-BAT therapy were 0.11/month ± 0.35 and 2.40/month ± 5.84 respectively (p=0.22), suggesting no differences in atrial arrhythmia rates at 12-months with BAT therapy. Conclusion Although BAT therapy has been shown to decrease hospitalization rates, BAT therapy is not associated with decreased atrial arrhythmia rates at 6 months and 12 months.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
LAC+USC Medical Center (US), Keck Hospital of USC (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.