The effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on fractional flow reserve and non-hyperemic pressure ratios

Abstract Background Coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a very frequent clinical issue. Complex coronary artery disease can negatively influence outcomes after TAVI, however, angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been shown to offer any prognostic benefit. Coronary pressure indices, to select which lesions need treatment, are promising but are currently underused in aortic stenosis (AS) patients due to many physiological pitfalls. Available studies are small and show conflicting results on the effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) on these indices. Purpose The aims is to compare the effects of TAVI on fractional flow reserve (FFR) and Non-hyperemic pressure ratio’s (NHPRs). Both immediate and long-term effects were studied. Methods Lesion specific coronary pressure data was extracted from 6 studies resulting in 147 lesions for immediate change in FFR analysis and 105 for NHPR analysis. To investigate the long-term changes, 93 lesions for FFR analysis and 68 for NHPR analysis were found. Results Immediately after TAVI, FFR decreased significantly (-0.0130 ± 0.0406 standard deviation, p-value: 0.0002) while NHPR remained stable (0.0003 ± 0.0675, p-value: 0.9675). Long-term after TAVR, FFR decreased significantly (-0.0230 ± 0.0747, p-value:0.0038) while NHPR increased non-significantly (0.0166 ± 0.0699, p-value: 0.0543). This increase in NHPRs became significant when only borderline NHPR lesions were considered (0.0249 ± 0.0441, p-value: 0.0015). All other results were confirmed in borderline-only lesions. Conclusions TAVI caused small significant, but opposite, changes in FFR and NHPR. In AS, FFR might underestimate lesion significance while NHPRs might overestimate its significance. This is only clinically relevant in borderline lesions, clear positive or negative physiological assessments can be trusted.Figure 1Figure 2

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2353
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on fractional flow reserve and non-hyperemic pressure ratios

Lennert Minten, Christophe Dubois, Hisao Otsuki, William F. Fearon et al.
1 links
European Heart Journal
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

The effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on fractional flow reserve and non-hyperemic pressure ratios

Lennert Minten, Christophe Dubois, Hisao Otsuki, William F. Fearon, Kuniaki Takahashi, J Bennett
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a very frequent clinical issue. Complex coronary artery disease can negatively influence outcomes after TAVI, however, angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been shown to offer any prognostic benefit. Coronary pressure indices, to select which lesions need treatment, are promising but are currently underused in aortic stenosis (AS) patients due to many physiological pitfalls. Available studies are small and show conflicting results on the effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) on these indices. Purpose The aims is to compare the effects of TAVI on fractional flow reserve (FFR) and Non-hyperemic pressure ratio’s (NHPRs). Both immediate and long-term effects were studied. Methods Lesion specific coronary pressure data was extracted from 6 studies resulting in 147 lesions for immediate change in FFR analysis and 105 for NHPR analysis. To investigate the long-term changes, 93 lesions for FFR analysis and 68 for NHPR analysis were found. Results Immediately after TAVI, FFR decreased significantly (-0.0130 ± 0.0406 standard deviation, p-value: 0.0002) while NHPR remained stable (0.0003 ± 0.0675, p-value: 0.9675). Long-term after TAVR, FFR decreased significantly (-0.0230 ± 0.0747, p-value:0.0038) while NHPR increased non-significantly (0.0166 ± 0.0699, p-value: 0.0543). This increase in NHPRs became significant when only borderline NHPR lesions were considered (0.0249 ± 0.0441, p-value: 0.0015). All other results were confirmed in borderline-only lesions. Conclusions TAVI caused small significant, but opposite, changes in FFR and NHPR. In AS, FFR might underestimate lesion significance while NHPRs might overestimate its significance. This is only clinically relevant in borderline lesions, clear positive or negative physiological assessments can be trusted.Figure 1Figure 2

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE), Stanford University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.