Comparative analysis of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction

Abstract Background Apart from sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, the efficacy of renin–angiotensin system inhibitors/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (RASI/ARNI)j8788 as well as mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction remains uncertain. We assessed the association between these medications and outcomes in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Methods Patients with HFmrEF from our university hospital-integrated Medical Database were included. Associations between the medications and cardiovascular mortality/heart failure hospitalization were evaluated using Cox regressions in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed to balance baseline patient characteristics. Results Of 2584 patients with HFmrEF, 17% received MRA and 43% received RASI/ARNI. Predictors of MRA use included older age, slightly higher ejection fraction, lower NT-proBNP level, and eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Predictors of RASI/ARNI use included higher body mass index, lower NT-proBNP level, normal uric acid level, normal potassium level, and eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. MRA use was not associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78–1.02 and HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.94–1.09, respectively). Conversely, RASI/ARNI use was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death but not hospitalization for heart failure (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.71–0.94 and HR = 0.995, 95% CI: 0.924–1.07, respectively). Notably, landmark analysis revealed no significant difference in the risk of outcomes when the follow-up duration exceeded two years. Conclusions The effect of MRA on cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure was neutral, whereas RASI/ARNI was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death. Our findings suggest that RASi use may be more beneficial than MRA use in patients with HFmrEF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.859
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction

C C L Lee, Dong Kuan, Tsung‐Hsien Lin, Wei Wu
European Heart Journal
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Comparative analysis of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction

C C L Lee, Dong Kuan, Tsung‐Hsien Lin, Wei Wu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Apart from sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, the efficacy of renin–angiotensin system inhibitors/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (RASI/ARNI)j8788 as well as mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction remains uncertain. We assessed the association between these medications and outcomes in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Methods Patients with HFmrEF from our university hospital-integrated Medical Database were included. Associations between the medications and cardiovascular mortality/heart failure hospitalization were evaluated using Cox regressions in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed to balance baseline patient characteristics. Results Of 2584 patients with HFmrEF, 17% received MRA and 43% received RASI/ARNI. Predictors of MRA use included older age, slightly higher ejection fraction, lower NT-proBNP level, and eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Predictors of RASI/ARNI use included higher body mass index, lower NT-proBNP level, normal uric acid level, normal potassium level, and eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. MRA use was not associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78–1.02 and HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.94–1.09, respectively). Conversely, RASI/ARNI use was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death but not hospitalization for heart failure (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.71–0.94 and HR = 0.995, 95% CI: 0.924–1.07, respectively). Notably, landmark analysis revealed no significant difference in the risk of outcomes when the follow-up duration exceeded two years. Conclusions The effect of MRA on cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure was neutral, whereas RASI/ARNI was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death. Our findings suggest that RASi use may be more beneficial than MRA use in patients with HFmrEF.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.