Prognostic role of right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling assessed by TAPSE/PASP ratio in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced ejection fraction

Abstract Background The development of right ventricular (RV)-pulmonary arterial (PA) coupling has resulted in a novel and comprehensive index for evaluating RV function in relation to the underlying RV afterload. In patients with heart failure (HF), it is acknowledged that RV-PA uncoupling are features that are associated with poor outcome. The RV-PA coupling index can be readily assessed non-invasively using the ratio of two standard echocardiographic measurements: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). However, few studies have defined the prognostic impact of the TAPSE/PASP ratio in patients with HF and mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF). Methods From the prospective cohort study of 1,410 hospitalized HF patients (age 68+/-15, men 62%) between August 2015 and September 2019, this study enrolled 191 HFmrEF (i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 41–49%) patients whose TAPSE and PASP were measured during hospitalization and discharged alive. We studied the prognostic impact of TAPSE/PASP ratio on HFmrEF patients using by cut-off value obtained from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The primary and secondary endpoints was defined as the all-cause death and HF re-hospitalization after discharge, respectively. Results During median follow-up of 38 [23–52] months, 48 patients (25%) died. The deceased patients had a significantly older (median 75 vs. 71 years, p<0.05), higher rate of ischemic heart disease (50% vs. 23%, p<0.05), elevated brain natriuretic peptide levels (325 vs. 159 pg/ml, p<0.05) and lower rate of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (65% vs. 80%, p<0.05) at discharge. In the ROC analysis, the cut-off value of TAPSE/PASP ratio for mortality was 0.46. Patients with TAPSE/PASP ≤0.46 had a significantly higher all-cause mortality (log-rank p<0.05) and had a tendency of higher rate of HF re-hospitalization than patients with TAPSE/PASP >0.46 (log-rank p=0.06) (Figure). Using multivariate analysis, the lower TAPSE/PASP ratio had an independent predictive value of prognosis in patients with HFmrEF (hazard ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval; 1.08–3.92, p<0.05) (Table). Conclusion The TAPSE/PASP ratio has a significant prognostic value in patients with HFmrEF. The RV-PA uncoupling assessed by TAPSE/PASP ratio might be useful for risk assessment in patients with HFmrEF.