Real-world analysis of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with prostate cancer and severe aortic stenosis

Abstract Background Patients with prostate cancer have a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease, including degenerative heart valve diseases such as aortic stenosis. It is not uncommon in clinical practice to perform transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis and active prostate cancer. Still, the prognosis after this procedure in this population is not well known. Purpose To evaluate 1-year and 3-year survival rates after TAVR in patients with prostate cancer who have undergone TAVR when compared with patients without active cancer. Methods Data were extracted from electronic medical records of a large multinational collaborative network (TriNetX) that currently englobes 113 healthcare organizations worldwide with more than 100 million patients. Patients aged 18 years or older with prostate cancer documented up to 12 months before TAVR as well as controls undergoing TAVR without oncologic history before the proceeding were included. The survival analysis for 1 year and 3 years was performed with Kaplan Meier survival plots and log-rank test. Propensity score matching, using clinical and demographic variables, was performed to pair the cohorts. Results From a cohort of 26,656 men who had undergone TAVR, we identified 1,040 with prostate cancer diagnosed up to 1 year before TAVR ( prostate cancer group) and 20,231 patients without oncologic history before TAVI (control group). After propensity score matching, analyzing 1,040 patients in each group, the 1-year and 3-year survival probabilities were not different between the prostate cancer group versus the control group ( 89.5% vs 88.9%, log-rank test P=0.70 and 72.6% vs 68.7%, log-rank test P=0.22, respectively). Considering a subgroup of patients with metastatic prostate cancer ( n=229) under androgen deprivation therapy vs the control group ( n =229), we have also not observed a survival difference between the two groups at 1-year and 3-year follow-up ( 88.1 vs 89.1%, log-rank test P=0.69 and 58.7% vs 67.4%, log-rank test P=0.25). Conclusions In this real-world analysis, patients with prostate cancer and severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR, including patients with metastatic disease, the 1-year and 3-year survival rates were not significantly different when compared to patients without oncologic hystory who underwent TAVR.