Coronary slow flow as measured by corrected TIMI frame counts is associated with impaired microvascular resistance

Abstract Background The Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon (CSFP) reflects an increased resting microvascular resistance and has been defined as a corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (cTFC) >27 in the in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there is limited and conflicting data on the diagnostic utility of CTFC with respect to gold standard coronary haemodynamic parameters; namely coronary flow reserve (CFR) and hyperaemic microvascular resistance (hMR). Purpose To evaluate the relationship between angiography-derived cTFC and the coronary haemodynamic parameters (CFR and hMR). Methods Patients with angina and non-obstructive CAD (< 50% epicardial stenosis; ANOCA) underwent comprehensive functional coronary angiography utilising a dual sensor-tipped pressure-doppler flow wire during adenosine infusion for investigation of coronary microvascular impairment, and acetylcholine provocative testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery spasm. Results In 103 patients who underwent functional coronary angiography, 60 patients had CSFP and this was associated with low flow velocity and higher microvascular resistance at rest as compared with patients without CSFP (19.2 ± 7.3 versus 22.6 ± 6.7, p=0.024; and 5.9 ± 2.0 versus 4.6 ± 1.7, p=0.009, respectively). Whilst cTFC was poorly associated with CFR (r= 0.058, p= 0.564), there was a relatively strong, positive correlation with hMR (r=0.258, p=0.008). Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated that CTFC poorly predicts an impaired CFR <2.5 (AUC, 0.479 [0.36-0.59]) but does predict an impaired hMR >2.5 (AUC, 0.623 [0.51-0.74] p=0.037). Conclusion In patients with ANOCA, cTFC is associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction as measured by microvascular resistance during hyperaemia. This data suggests the cTFC may be a surrogate marker for impaired microvascular resistance.cTFC versus hMR

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2331
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coronary slow flow as measured by corrected TIMI frame counts is associated with impaired microvascular resistance

Eng Lee Ooi, Ambreen Sheikh, O. Girolamo, Rosanna Tavella et al.
European Heart Journal
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Coronary slow flow as measured by corrected TIMI frame counts is associated with impaired microvascular resistance

Eng Lee Ooi, Ambreen Sheikh, O. Girolamo, Rosanna Tavella, John Francis Beltrame, Muhammad Dzafir Ismali, C. Zeitz, S. La
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon (CSFP) reflects an increased resting microvascular resistance and has been defined as a corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (cTFC) >27 in the in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there is limited and conflicting data on the diagnostic utility of CTFC with respect to gold standard coronary haemodynamic parameters; namely coronary flow reserve (CFR) and hyperaemic microvascular resistance (hMR). Purpose To evaluate the relationship between angiography-derived cTFC and the coronary haemodynamic parameters (CFR and hMR). Methods Patients with angina and non-obstructive CAD (< 50% epicardial stenosis; ANOCA) underwent comprehensive functional coronary angiography utilising a dual sensor-tipped pressure-doppler flow wire during adenosine infusion for investigation of coronary microvascular impairment, and acetylcholine provocative testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery spasm. Results In 103 patients who underwent functional coronary angiography, 60 patients had CSFP and this was associated with low flow velocity and higher microvascular resistance at rest as compared with patients without CSFP (19.2 ± 7.3 versus 22.6 ± 6.7, p=0.024; and 5.9 ± 2.0 versus 4.6 ± 1.7, p=0.009, respectively). Whilst cTFC was poorly associated with CFR (r= 0.058, p= 0.564), there was a relatively strong, positive correlation with hMR (r=0.258, p=0.008). Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated that CTFC poorly predicts an impaired CFR <2.5 (AUC, 0.479 [0.36-0.59]) but does predict an impaired hMR >2.5 (AUC, 0.623 [0.51-0.74] p=0.037). Conclusion In patients with ANOCA, cTFC is associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction as measured by microvascular resistance during hyperaemia. This data suggests the cTFC may be a surrogate marker for impaired microvascular resistance.cTFC versus hMR

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
University Malaya Medical Centre (MY), Lyell McEwin Hospital (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.