Enhancing guidewire efficacy for transradial access: the EAGER randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background and Purpose The standard J tip peripheral guidewire used to perform coronary angiography was originally designed for transfemoral access and large vascular interventions over 70 years ago. The 3mm J tip on the standard wire is larger than the typical radial artery diameter and has limited ability to navigate smaller tortuous peripheral arteries increasing the risk of vessel spasm, and potentially reducing procedural success. We compared the efficacy and safety of a hydrophilic 1.5mm J tip guidewire (intervention - ‘baby J wire’) upfront versus the standard fixed core 0.035" J wire (‘control wire’). Methods Investigator initiated, blinded multicentre randomised trial conducted in Australia. Patients undergoing clinically indicated transradial coronary angiography were randomized 1:1 to either control or baby J peripheral guidewire use upfront. The primary endpoint was technical success defined as gaining access to the aortic root with the randomised guidewire. Secondary endpoints included total procedural time, time to aorta and coronary intubation, crossover rates to alternate wire or access site, fluoroscopy times, radial artery spasm, haematoma (EASY criteria), bleeding complications (BARC criteria) and vascular complications (VARC 2 criteria). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and clinical endpoints were adjudicated by a blinded independent clinical events committee. Results 330 patients were enrolled over a 9-month period from October 2022 to June 2023. The median age was 69 years (36% female), BMI 29kg/m2. The primary efficacy endpoint of technical success was achieved more frequently in the intervention group (96% v 85%; ARR 10.9% (95% CI 4.6 -17.2); P <0.001). Women were significantly more likely to benefit from the intervention related to higher failure rates with the control wire (69% vs 93% in men; P = < 0.001). Overall procedure times were similar between the groups (median 1135 vs 1354 seconds; P=0.094) but fluoroscopy time was lower in the baby J wire group (median 344 vs 491 seconds; P = 0.024). Radial completion of procedures was high and did not differ between groups (100% v 98%; P=0.2). Clinically significant bleeding (BARC2+) was more common in the control wire group (3% v 0%; P=0.017). There were no differences in MACE or vascular complications. Conclusion The hydrophilic 1.5mm J tip Baby J peripheral guidewire leads to greater upfront technical success and reduced fluoroscopy time for transradial coronary angiography compared to the standard 3mm J tip guidewire. The baby J hydrophilic guidewire is safe and may have key incremental benefits for the transradial approach particularly in patients with smaller diameter radial arteries including women.Primary Outcome