Low clinical utility of global longitudinal strain in a real-world breast cancer population

Abstract Background The 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Cardio-Oncology guidelines recommend the use of global longitudinal strain (GLS) to detect mild asymptomatic cancer therapy related cardiac dysfunction (ma-CTRCD). However, it remains unknown how to best manage these patients in order to prevent clinically significant CTRCD. Purpose To assess the course and outcomes of breast cancer patients meeting criteria for ma-CTRCD. Methods Echocardiograms and medical records were assessed for breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab or an anthracycline, who underwent serial echocardiographic monitoring, including routine GLS. CTRCD was defined as an absolute decline in LVEF of >10% to <50%. ma-CTRCD was defined as a relative decline in average GLS of >15%, in the absence of significant LVEF decline. Normal was defined as no significant change in LVEF or GLS during cancer therapy. Clinical and echocardiographic course post ma-CTRCD detection was assessed. Baseline risk factors were compared between the three groups. Results 878 echocardiograms from 258 patients were analysed. GLS analysis was available in 76% of echocardiograms. CTRCD occurred in 23 (9%) and ma-CTRCD in 63 (24%). Only eight ma-CTRCD patients had management altered (cancer therapy withheld/ceased in three and heart failure medication commenced in six). Only two ma-CTRCD patients subsequently developed CTRCD, and GLS improved in 74%. Compared to the normal group (172, 67%), at baseline the ma-CTRCD group had higher average GLS (-21.8 vs -19.4, p<0.0001) and less borderline/abnormal average GLS (4% vs 36%, p<0.004). Conclusion Isolated declines in GLS are common and may have low clinical utility in preventing CTRCD. The findings support ESC guideline recommendations that cancer therapy should not be withheld in these patients. Those with higher baseline GLS may be more prone to clinically insignificant declines in GLS during cancer therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.3212
Primary Topic
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low clinical utility of global longitudinal strain in a real-world breast cancer population

L. Ruane, John James Atherton, S. K. Prasad
European Heart Journal
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
article

Low clinical utility of global longitudinal strain in a real-world breast cancer population

L. Ruane, John James Atherton, S. K. Prasad
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Cardio-Oncology guidelines recommend the use of global longitudinal strain (GLS) to detect mild asymptomatic cancer therapy related cardiac dysfunction (ma-CTRCD). However, it remains unknown how to best manage these patients in order to prevent clinically significant CTRCD. Purpose To assess the course and outcomes of breast cancer patients meeting criteria for ma-CTRCD. Methods Echocardiograms and medical records were assessed for breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab or an anthracycline, who underwent serial echocardiographic monitoring, including routine GLS. CTRCD was defined as an absolute decline in LVEF of >10% to <50%. ma-CTRCD was defined as a relative decline in average GLS of >15%, in the absence of significant LVEF decline. Normal was defined as no significant change in LVEF or GLS during cancer therapy. Clinical and echocardiographic course post ma-CTRCD detection was assessed. Baseline risk factors were compared between the three groups. Results 878 echocardiograms from 258 patients were analysed. GLS analysis was available in 76% of echocardiograms. CTRCD occurred in 23 (9%) and ma-CTRCD in 63 (24%). Only eight ma-CTRCD patients had management altered (cancer therapy withheld/ceased in three and heart failure medication commenced in six). Only two ma-CTRCD patients subsequently developed CTRCD, and GLS improved in 74%. Compared to the normal group (172, 67%), at baseline the ma-CTRCD group had higher average GLS (-21.8 vs -19.4, p<0.0001) and less borderline/abnormal average GLS (4% vs 36%, p<0.004). Conclusion Isolated declines in GLS are common and may have low clinical utility in preventing CTRCD. The findings support ESC guideline recommendations that cancer therapy should not be withheld in these patients. Those with higher baseline GLS may be more prone to clinically insignificant declines in GLS during cancer therapy.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU), Prince Charles Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.