SMART-2D: a novel scoring system to predict non diagnostic exercise stress echocardiography in renal transplant candidates

Abstract Background Exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) is often used for pre-renal transplant risk stratification. Nearly 20% of ESE may be non-diagnostic, resulting in delays to transplant and increased healthcare cost. A simple, reliable tool for predicting non-diagnostic ESE may streamline assessment. Methods Retrospective analysis of 898 kidney transplant candidates between 2013-2020 who underwent exercise stress echocardiography for pre-transplant cardiovascular assessment was performed. The cohort was separated into a derivation and validation set. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of non-diagnostic ESE. Covariates associated with non-diagnostic ESE (p<0.10) on univariate analysis were included in the multivariable model. From this model, only variables with p<0.05 were included for score development. Model discrimination was assessed by area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). Results Non-diagnostic ESE occurred in 17% (151/898). Predictors of non-diagnostic study formed the scoring system: 1 point for female sex, 2 points for BMI >40, 1 point for age >55, Heart Rate<55 4 points, <65 3 points and <75 2 points. LV Hypertrophy was assigned 2 points, Type 1 Diabetes 3 points and Type 2 diabetes 1 point, LV Dysfunction was assigned 2 points. This scoring system had excellent discriminative ability (derivation AUROC 0.80, validation AUROC 0.81). A score of 8 or more had a specificity of 97% and a positive likelihood ratio of 9.4 for non-diagnostic ESE. A score of <8 had a negative predictive value of 86%. Patients with Non-Diagnostic ESE had longer time to transplantation (695 vs 636 days), and more investigations performed (43.05% vs 17.94%, p<0.001) and less likely to receive a renal transplant (OR 0.47, p<0.001). Conclusion Non diagnostic ESE in pre-transplant assessment causes significant delays to patient care. A simple clinical scoring system may identify patients likely to have non-diagnostic ESE and can be utilised to identify patients who may benefit from alternative risk-stratification investigations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.3116
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SMART-2D: a novel scoring system to predict non diagnostic exercise stress echocardiography in renal transplant candidates

Justine Chan, T. Abrahams, Nitesh Nerlekar, Sean Tan
European Heart Journal
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

SMART-2D: a novel scoring system to predict non diagnostic exercise stress echocardiography in renal transplant candidates

Justine Chan, T. Abrahams, Nitesh Nerlekar, Sean Tan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) is often used for pre-renal transplant risk stratification. Nearly 20% of ESE may be non-diagnostic, resulting in delays to transplant and increased healthcare cost. A simple, reliable tool for predicting non-diagnostic ESE may streamline assessment. Methods Retrospective analysis of 898 kidney transplant candidates between 2013-2020 who underwent exercise stress echocardiography for pre-transplant cardiovascular assessment was performed. The cohort was separated into a derivation and validation set. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of non-diagnostic ESE. Covariates associated with non-diagnostic ESE (p<0.10) on univariate analysis were included in the multivariable model. From this model, only variables with p<0.05 were included for score development. Model discrimination was assessed by area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). Results Non-diagnostic ESE occurred in 17% (151/898). Predictors of non-diagnostic study formed the scoring system: 1 point for female sex, 2 points for BMI >40, 1 point for age >55, Heart Rate<55 4 points, <65 3 points and <75 2 points. LV Hypertrophy was assigned 2 points, Type 1 Diabetes 3 points and Type 2 diabetes 1 point, LV Dysfunction was assigned 2 points. This scoring system had excellent discriminative ability (derivation AUROC 0.80, validation AUROC 0.81). A score of 8 or more had a specificity of 97% and a positive likelihood ratio of 9.4 for non-diagnostic ESE. A score of <8 had a negative predictive value of 86%. Patients with Non-Diagnostic ESE had longer time to transplantation (695 vs 636 days), and more investigations performed (43.05% vs 17.94%, p<0.001) and less likely to receive a renal transplant (OR 0.47, p<0.001). Conclusion Non diagnostic ESE in pre-transplant assessment causes significant delays to patient care. A simple clinical scoring system may identify patients likely to have non-diagnostic ESE and can be utilised to identify patients who may benefit from alternative risk-stratification investigations.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.