Impact of Probiotic Supplementation on Kidney Transplantation Outcomes

Background: The effect of probiotic supplementation on kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes has limited evidence, leading to an unclear understanding of the potential advantages and disadvantages in KT recipients. This study aims to explore the effects of probiotic supplementation on KT outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records from 354 KT recipients at Korea University Anam Hospital between January 2010 and December 2020. Only patients who had taken probiotics within 1 year post-KT were included, and transplant outcomes, including graft function, infections, and cardiovascular events, were evaluated 1-3 years after KT. Results: Of the 354 recipients (mean age: 48.03 years; 31.64% female), 97 received probiotics during the study period, with 36 taking them for >3 months. Probiotic types included Lactobacillus spp. (45.4%), Bacillus subtilis (14.4%), and others (40.2%). The average duration of supplementation was 104.8 days. The probiotics group showed no significant difference in eGFR at 1 and 3 years compared with the non-probiotics group. CMV viremia occurred in 80 patients, with a higher incidence in the probiotics group (35.1 vs. 14.0%). No significant differences were reported in BK viremia or COVID-19 infection. During the study period, 116 patients received antibiotics for >1 week, and the prevalence of bacterial infection was no significantly difference between the two groups. In addition, 15 patients experienced new-onset cardiovascular disease, with no significant difference between the groups. Propensity score matching, employed to address baseline differences between groups also revealed that probiotic supplementation was only significantly associated with the development of CMV viremia, suggesting a potential immunomodulatory effect of probiotics on T-cell function and CMV infection. Conclusion: This study identified a notable association between probiotic use and CMV viremia after KT. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to comprehensively understand the impact of probiotics on immunocompromised patients and to obtain sufficient evidence for both their safety and effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.20249q46t454
Primary Topic
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Probiotic Supplementation on Kidney Transplantation Outcomes

Young Eun Choi, Yookyung Jang, Myung-Gyu Kim, Tai Yeon Koo et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
article

Impact of Probiotic Supplementation on Kidney Transplantation Outcomes

Young Eun Choi, Yookyung Jang, Myung-Gyu Kim, Tai Yeon Koo, Sang‐Kyung Jo, Se Won Oh, Ko Yoon Sook, Lee Hee Young
article en

Abstract

Background: The effect of probiotic supplementation on kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes has limited evidence, leading to an unclear understanding of the potential advantages and disadvantages in KT recipients. This study aims to explore the effects of probiotic supplementation on KT outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records from 354 KT recipients at Korea University Anam Hospital between January 2010 and December 2020. Only patients who had taken probiotics within 1 year post-KT were included, and transplant outcomes, including graft function, infections, and cardiovascular events, were evaluated 1-3 years after KT. Results: Of the 354 recipients (mean age: 48.03 years; 31.64% female), 97 received probiotics during the study period, with 36 taking them for >3 months. Probiotic types included Lactobacillus spp. (45.4%), Bacillus subtilis (14.4%), and others (40.2%). The average duration of supplementation was 104.8 days. The probiotics group showed no significant difference in eGFR at 1 and 3 years compared with the non-probiotics group. CMV viremia occurred in 80 patients, with a higher incidence in the probiotics group (35.1 vs. 14.0%). No significant differences were reported in BK viremia or COVID-19 infection. During the study period, 116 patients received antibiotics for >1 week, and the prevalence of bacterial infection was no significantly difference between the two groups. In addition, 15 patients experienced new-onset cardiovascular disease, with no significant difference between the groups. Propensity score matching, employed to address baseline differences between groups also revealed that probiotic supplementation was only significantly associated with the development of CMV viremia, suggesting a potential immunomodulatory effect of probiotics on T-cell function and CMV infection. Conclusion: This study identified a notable association between probiotic use and CMV viremia after KT. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to comprehensively understand the impact of probiotics on immunocompromised patients and to obtain sufficient evidence for both their safety and effectiveness.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Korea University (JP)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.