Nephrology Tools: Using Chatbots for Image Interpretation and Answering Questions

Background: Effective medical diagnosis and treatment planning rely heavily on clinical imaging. As of September 2023, ChatGPT-4 had broadened its functionality to allow image interpretation, providing comprehensive explanations and problem-solving insights. However, the effectiveness of chatbots in image interpretation remains understudied. We aimed to evaluate the performance of leading chatbots (i.e GPT-4, Bard AI, and Bing Chat), in interpreting nephrology images and addressing related test questions. Methods: We assessed 57 nephrology test questions with their associated images from the Nephrology Self-Assessment Program and Kidney Self-Assessment Program tests. This group included 19 kidney histopathological images, 28 radiological images, and 10 images from miscellaneous categories. We ommited the image descriptions to focus only on the chatbots' interpretative abilities. Each question was analyzed two times through GPT-4, Bing Chat, and Bard AI. We then calculated and compared the accuracy and concordance rates for both image interpretation and question answering by these AI models. Results: Regarding image interpretation, GPT-4 showed a 79% total accuracy, outperforming Bard AI’s 51% and Bing Chat’s 35% (p<0.001). All chatbots displayed a similar performance across image types (p=0.57, 0.39, and 0.38 for GPT-4, Bard AI and Bing Chat, respectively). On image-related questions, GPT-4, Bard, and Bing Chat yielded comparable results, with total accuracy rates of 60%, 53%, and 61% (p>0.05) and concordance rates of 75%, 68%, and 74% (p>0.05), respectively. Notably, GPT-4 and Bard AI were likely to provide correct answer when their image interpretation was accurate (correct response 60% vs 37%, p=0.01 for GPT-4; 60% vs 27%, p<0.001 for Bard AI when image interpretation was correct and incorrect respectively), while Bing Chat’s accuracy on answering questions did not differ based on its accuracy of image interpretation (58% vs 51%, p=0.50). Conclusion: These results highlight the challenges in developing AI-driven chatbots for medical image interpretation in nephrology, with GPT-4 showeing remarkable potential. The study provides valuable insights for further refinement of AI models, emphasizing the importance of accuracy, especially in scenarios where medical decisions rely on precise image interpretations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2024j2rgrwm6
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nephrology Tools: Using Chatbots for Image Interpretation and Answering Questions

Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Jing Miao, Oscar A. Garcia Valencia, Supawadee Suppadungsuk et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

Nephrology Tools: Using Chatbots for Image Interpretation and Answering Questions

Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Jing Miao, Oscar A. Garcia Valencia, Supawadee Suppadungsuk, Pajaree Krisanapan, Charat Thongprayoon
article en

Abstract

Background: Effective medical diagnosis and treatment planning rely heavily on clinical imaging. As of September 2023, ChatGPT-4 had broadened its functionality to allow image interpretation, providing comprehensive explanations and problem-solving insights. However, the effectiveness of chatbots in image interpretation remains understudied. We aimed to evaluate the performance of leading chatbots (i.e GPT-4, Bard AI, and Bing Chat), in interpreting nephrology images and addressing related test questions. Methods: We assessed 57 nephrology test questions with their associated images from the Nephrology Self-Assessment Program and Kidney Self-Assessment Program tests. This group included 19 kidney histopathological images, 28 radiological images, and 10 images from miscellaneous categories. We ommited the image descriptions to focus only on the chatbots' interpretative abilities. Each question was analyzed two times through GPT-4, Bing Chat, and Bard AI. We then calculated and compared the accuracy and concordance rates for both image interpretation and question answering by these AI models. Results: Regarding image interpretation, GPT-4 showed a 79% total accuracy, outperforming Bard AI’s 51% and Bing Chat’s 35% (p<0.001). All chatbots displayed a similar performance across image types (p=0.57, 0.39, and 0.38 for GPT-4, Bard AI and Bing Chat, respectively). On image-related questions, GPT-4, Bard, and Bing Chat yielded comparable results, with total accuracy rates of 60%, 53%, and 61% (p>0.05) and concordance rates of 75%, 68%, and 74% (p>0.05), respectively. Notably, GPT-4 and Bard AI were likely to provide correct answer when their image interpretation was accurate (correct response 60% vs 37%, p=0.01 for GPT-4; 60% vs 27%, p<0.001 for Bard AI when image interpretation was correct and incorrect respectively), while Bing Chat’s accuracy on answering questions did not differ based on its accuracy of image interpretation (58% vs 51%, p=0.50). Conclusion: These results highlight the challenges in developing AI-driven chatbots for medical image interpretation in nephrology, with GPT-4 showeing remarkable potential. The study provides valuable insights for further refinement of AI models, emphasizing the importance of accuracy, especially in scenarios where medical decisions rely on precise image interpretations.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Mayo Clinic (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.