Temporal trends in lipid management among Korean patients following acute myocardial infarction from 2011 to 2020

Abstract Background/Purpose Real-world data trends on dyslipidaemia prevalence and lipid management for patients following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are lacking in South Korea, one of the Asia-Pacific nations. Our study aimed to evaluate the 10-year temporal trends of dyslipidaemia prevalence and lipid management in this patient population. Methods The study utilized datasets from two Korean AMI observational cohort (2011–2020) including a total of 26,751 participants (Figure 1A). The primary endpoints were as follows: (1) absolute low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of <70 mg/dL; (2) relative LDL-C target of >50% LDL-C reduction from the baseline; (3) absolute or relative LDL-C target (American target); and (4) both absolute and relative LDL-C targets (European target). Results The prevalence of dyslipidaemia increased from 11.1% to 17.1% (Table 1, Figure 1B), while the statin prescription rates increased from 92.9% to 97.0% from 2011 to 2020. High-intensity statin use increased from 12.80% in 2012 to 69.30% in 2020 (Table 1) Interestingly, the yearlong substantial increases in the prescription rates of high-intensity statins were prominent between 2013 (21.9%) and 2014 (37.7%) and between 2018 (52.4%) and 2019 (66.1%), which may have been influenced by major revisions to the international lipid management guidelines and their adoption (Figure 1C). Ezetimibe use increased from 4.50% in 2016 to 22.50% in 2020. The achievement rate of the absolute and relative LDL-C targets increased from 41.4% and 20.8% in 2012 to 62.5% and 39.5% in 2019, respectively (Table 1). The achievement rates of the American (45.7% in 2012 to 68.6% in 2019) and European (16.5% in 2012 to 33.8% in 2019) targets showed similar increasing trends (Table 1, Figure 1D). Conclusions Despite the adoption of lipid management guidelines in clinical practice has improved, some patients some patients are unable to reduce their LDL-C concentrations to their target levels. Our real-world analyses emphasise the need for multidirectional and continued efforts to optimise lipid management and improve the clinical outcomes in these patients.Figure 1