Breast arterial calcification: a potential novel imaging marker for HFpEF

Abstract Background Breast arterial calcification (BAC) on mammography has been shown to associate with cardiovascular disease, however the association with heart failure (HF) remains largely uncharacterised. BAC is a medial arterial calcification process, which is a marker of vascular stiffness, a key contributor to diastolic dysfunction (DD) and HFpEF. We sought to evaluate the association between BAC and HFpEF. Purpose This study aims to assess the relationship between BAC status and HFpEF. Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study included 100 consecutive patients with clinically indicated mammography and echocardiography within 6 months of each other. BAC was visually assessed to determine presence or absence. HFpEF was diagnosed based on combined clinical and echocardiographic assessment. DD was defined by Mitter et. al’s(1) criteria after review of echocardiograms. Logistic regression analysis with Odds Ratio (OR) and (95% confidence intervals) are reported for association with any HF, HFpEF, or DD adjusting for modifiable (body mass index, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, current smoking, diabetes mellitus) and non-modifiable (age, past smoking breast cancer, past ischaemic heart disease (IHD), atrial fibrillation (AF), chronic kidney disease (CKD)) risk factors. Results The prevalence of BAC was 27% and 13% had HFpEF and 55.8% had DD. Patients with BAC were older (mean age 73±13 vs 57±13, p<0.01) with greater proportion of hypertension (66.67% vs 39.73%, p=0.02), hypercholesterolaemia (70.37% vs 43.84%, p=0.02), AF (p<0.01), previous IHD (p=0.01), and CKD (p<0.01). After adjustment for these variables, BAC was independently associated with HFpEF diagnosis for modifiable risk factors: (OR 2.47 [0.50-12.10], p<0.27) and non-modifiable factors (OR 6.96 [1.72-33.31], p<0.01). BAC was also independently associated with echo defined DD: adjusted for modifiable risk factors (OR 8.67 [2.49-42.16], p<0.01), and non-modifiable risk factors (OR 8.25 [2.44-38.27], p<0.01). Conclusions BAC is associated with HF presence, particularly HFpEF and DD. Further research is required to elucidate the role of shared pathophysiological mechanisms, such as vascular stiffness and general arterial calcification, common to BAC, DD, and HFpEF. In the future, BAC may act as a useful surrogate and opportunistic marker to instigate further review if implemented in established widespread breast-screening programs for detection of subclinical disease.Figure 1:Case example of imaging assess

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.3085
Primary Topic
Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breast arterial calcification: a potential novel imaging marker for HFpEF

Vivek Goel, Hung‐Pin Tu, Clarence Yeong, Nitesh Nerlekar et al.
European Heart Journal
Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
article

Breast arterial calcification: a potential novel imaging marker for HFpEF

Vivek Goel, Hung‐Pin Tu, Clarence Yeong, Nitesh Nerlekar, E. Aldous, Esther Davis, E. Xu, Andrew Salib, S Vasanthankumar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Breast arterial calcification (BAC) on mammography has been shown to associate with cardiovascular disease, however the association with heart failure (HF) remains largely uncharacterised. BAC is a medial arterial calcification process, which is a marker of vascular stiffness, a key contributor to diastolic dysfunction (DD) and HFpEF. We sought to evaluate the association between BAC and HFpEF. Purpose This study aims to assess the relationship between BAC status and HFpEF. Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study included 100 consecutive patients with clinically indicated mammography and echocardiography within 6 months of each other. BAC was visually assessed to determine presence or absence. HFpEF was diagnosed based on combined clinical and echocardiographic assessment. DD was defined by Mitter et. al’s(1) criteria after review of echocardiograms. Logistic regression analysis with Odds Ratio (OR) and (95% confidence intervals) are reported for association with any HF, HFpEF, or DD adjusting for modifiable (body mass index, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, current smoking, diabetes mellitus) and non-modifiable (age, past smoking breast cancer, past ischaemic heart disease (IHD), atrial fibrillation (AF), chronic kidney disease (CKD)) risk factors. Results The prevalence of BAC was 27% and 13% had HFpEF and 55.8% had DD. Patients with BAC were older (mean age 73±13 vs 57±13, p<0.01) with greater proportion of hypertension (66.67% vs 39.73%, p=0.02), hypercholesterolaemia (70.37% vs 43.84%, p=0.02), AF (p<0.01), previous IHD (p=0.01), and CKD (p<0.01). After adjustment for these variables, BAC was independently associated with HFpEF diagnosis for modifiable risk factors: (OR 2.47 [0.50-12.10], p<0.27) and non-modifiable factors (OR 6.96 [1.72-33.31], p<0.01). BAC was also independently associated with echo defined DD: adjusted for modifiable risk factors (OR 8.67 [2.49-42.16], p<0.01), and non-modifiable risk factors (OR 8.25 [2.44-38.27], p<0.01). Conclusions BAC is associated with HF presence, particularly HFpEF and DD. Further research is required to elucidate the role of shared pathophysiological mechanisms, such as vascular stiffness and general arterial calcification, common to BAC, DD, and HFpEF. In the future, BAC may act as a useful surrogate and opportunistic marker to instigate further review if implemented in established widespread breast-screening programs for detection of subclinical disease.Figure 1:Case example of imaging assess

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Monash Health (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.